+1 to this. I've made 11x14s of some of my B&W ones, but I wouldn't do it with all of mine. I've also seen a shot taken with a disposable camera blown up to 16x20 inches that really wasn't bad - the stars were aligned just right, I guess. It depends on how you want it to look.I'd suggest that the OP tries 8x10 upwards until he gets to the point where the print in his opinion ceases to be acceptable to him. Only he will know when he reaches this point.
+1 to this. I've made 11x14s of some of my B&W ones, but I wouldn't do it with all of mine. I've also seen a shot taken with a disposable camera blown up to 16x20 inches that really wasn't bad - the stars were aligned just right, I guess. It depends on how you want it to look.
not to hijack the thread, but do you think it matters if its a B&W neg vs a a color neg? was thinking tmax 100 vs ektar kinda thing.
a 16x20 inch print without a problem but ,I have made prints as large as32x40 inches from from MF film and17x28inches from an FX digital.Hello All,
Can anyone tell me what is the biggest print I can reasonably take from a good 35mm photo ? I have a few I would like to frame from my Cosmic 35m .
Thanks all
Yep, that's a good size, fits nice on 8X10 paper. My 35mm half frame jumbo size is 6X8 on 8X10 paper, other wise I print half frame on 5X7 paper and then if it looks ok I'll go up to 8X10 paper. Never tried scanning a fine grained B&W (never tried scanning at all for that matter) . For film mostly stick to 400 ISO B&W, what ever I can get the best deal on when I order. So not really planning for super size enlargements. I suppose I should try some 'T' grained film just to see what it will do.But I rarely print 35mm bigger than 6X9 inches.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?