What is 'grainy' to you?

Hidden

A
Hidden

  • 0
  • 0
  • 18
Is Jabba In?

A
Is Jabba In?

  • 2
  • 0
  • 27
Dog Opposites

A
Dog Opposites

  • 2
  • 3
  • 132
Acrobatics in the Vondelpark

A
Acrobatics in the Vondelpark

  • 6
  • 5
  • 220
Finn Slough Fishing Net

A
Finn Slough Fishing Net

  • 1
  • 0
  • 119

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,477
Messages
2,759,653
Members
99,514
Latest member
cukon
Recent bookmarks
0

bwrules

Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
195
Format
Multi Format
It was already a push of Neopan 400 to 800, and I never go beyond 800, even with Neopan 1600. Oh well.
 
OP
OP
Thomas Bertilsson
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,709
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
It was already a push of Neopan 400 to 800, and I never go beyond 800, even with Neopan 1600. Oh well.

That's understandable. Sometimes it just doesn't work out. But in the end, I think your photograph is good. It tells a sweet story of a boy on a set of stairs, and I think it would make a very appealing print.
Imagine it with the hand railing toned down, and some of the top cropped off. That would bring real focus to the boy's expression, whether it's focused or not. Not all successful photos have to be sharp.

Neopan 1600, by the way. I have recently re-discovered a few of my old negatives, and what a great shame it is discontinued. I made some 9x12" prints last night, and I was remarkably surprised that I got less grain from Neo 1600 than I do from Neopan 400 in the same developer, and in the same print size. And it's very sharp too!
 

bwrules

Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2008
Messages
195
Format
Multi Format
That's understandable. Sometimes it just doesn't work out. But in the end, I think your photograph is good. It tells a sweet story of a boy on a set of stairs, and I think it would make a very appealing print.
Imagine it with the hand railing toned down, and some of the top cropped off. That would bring real focus to the boy's expression, whether it's focused or not. Not all successful photos have to be sharp.

Thanks. I like blur too. Sometimes it works very well.

NP 1600 was my favorite low light film.
 

36cm2

Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2008
Messages
645
Location
Northeast U.
Format
Large Format
Keith Tapscott. said:
There's more to graininess than just the actual film and developer combination. Exposing the film more than it is necessary to obtain good shadow detail will increase graininess and lower the resolution.
The old 35mm magazines from around the 1950's-1960's always recommended using the minimum exposure required to get good shadow detail and the shortest possible developing time to produce a full tonal range on grade 3 paper instead of the usual grade 2, because that would provide the finest grain, with optimum sharpness and resolution.

Keith, my brain likes chomping on this nugget. Good stuff.
Leo
 
OP
OP
Thomas Bertilsson
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,709
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
Thomas, my personal view: Grain is simply a necessary evil in the making of silver halide film. I minimize its appearance as much as possible.

Ain't that the truth... It's there whether we like it or not, and it becomes a choice of what we do with it.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom