It was already a push of Neopan 400 to 800, and I never go beyond 800, even with Neopan 1600. Oh well.
That's understandable. Sometimes it just doesn't work out. But in the end, I think your photograph is good. It tells a sweet story of a boy on a set of stairs, and I think it would make a very appealing print.
Imagine it with the hand railing toned down, and some of the top cropped off. That would bring real focus to the boy's expression, whether it's focused or not. Not all successful photos have to be sharp.
Keith Tapscott. said:There's more to graininess than just the actual film and developer combination. Exposing the film more than it is necessary to obtain good shadow detail will increase graininess and lower the resolution.
The old 35mm magazines from around the 1950's-1960's always recommended using the minimum exposure required to get good shadow detail and the shortest possible developing time to produce a full tonal range on grade 3 paper instead of the usual grade 2, because that would provide the finest grain, with optimum sharpness and resolution.
Thomas, my personal view: Grain is simply a necessary evil in the making of silver halide film. I minimize its appearance as much as possible.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |