Kodachromeguy
Subscriber
In my opinion, Lee above is right about the supply of cameras aging and diminishing in number. This is old stuff, and stuff gets thrown out or water-damaged or lost. And he is right, all of these cameras with a very few exceptions and 20-40+ years old. Ergo, they need maintenance. I think a lot of people on film forums and even here are in a romantic world where cameras will be super cheap and work perfectly. I see 4 paths for buying film cameras:
- Buy cheap, use it, and put up with various issues (shutter speeds, fungus, whatever). But if it fails totally, you may not be able to replace it cheaply.
- Buy cheap and send it off for maintenance and service. Be willing to pay the price because the specialists need many hours of work. Do this soon while experienced camera technicians are still practicing and they can get parts. For example, Hasselblad in USA still takes in V-system cameras. You better take advantage of their service regardless of the cost.
- Buy mid-high-price from a vendor who claims to have had the equipment overhauled. Were they honest? Remember, in almost unused condition, such as a deceased collector's Leica, does not mean it is really working up to specification.
- Expensive: buy one of the few brand new film cameras, like the Nikon, Leica M, Alpa, or Linhof (probably a few more that take film backs).

