Hardly constructive for members to be the art police on a forum of photographers though.
We may as well have a trip into the mindgarden and see how one can be so certain it is not art.
I agree it's just an opinion amongst the powerless but it becomes a statement of fact when backed up by institutions, universities, and money.
It takes something to compare yourself to Picasso and Gaudi. And by the way, it was the Renaissance, not the Reconnaissance.
Renaissance painters didn't need artists statements because they were almost exclusively painting one of two subjects - religious iconography or thinly-veiled erotica in the form of allusions to classical antiquity. Actually, until the mid-19th century, artists statements were unnecessary because the vast majority of art being created was being created for patrons on commission, not being marketed by the artists to a leisure class whose disposable income they needed to attract.
Of course an artists statement is not necessary to do art. You can sit in your basement and do art all you want, and show it to nobody, and you'll never need an artists statement. If you sit in your basement and do art and only show it to the people who you invite into your home, you don't need an artists statement. If sit in your basement and make art and show it at camera clubs or coffee shops, you probably don't need an artists statement. BUT, if you want to be part of a cultural dialog and contribute to that dialog with your art, then you better damn well have one so that you can actually participate.
Note that an artists statement does not have to be twenty-five paragraphs of Lorem Ipsum-esque artspeak. It could be something as simple as a plain English description of your body of work. And it never hurt anyone to be able to speak coherently about the work that they do.
We usually call them poetry.
Art is made by people who are obviously not part of this forum.
Alan they have nothing to do with mission statements.
it's too bad people go through great lengths to marginalize people ...
hi craig75, not sure what the art police are, but I think TFC's opinion is from an educated and gallerists perspective.
when any institution has a requirement like an statement, it is just an obstacle that most people can easily go over to see if they are serious about whatever they are doing. writing an artist statement, like 5 sentences, it's not an 80page thesis that one has to defend in front of a panel of 12 people .. I don't really see what the problem is. granted most people on this website photograph as a hobby for pleasure they might not be submitting their work to museums or high end galleries &c and don't have to or need to jump through the hoops that others who are part of the discourse do, so I can see why the idea of writing a succinct statement about their images might seem kind of not worth it ...
I just saw whoever it was compared himself to Gaudi and Picasso ? if that's true an artist statement could be written in about 3 minutes not sure what the problem is, if he's that good should have plenty to say.
.
these comments about artist statements on this website are nothing new. they are hand in glove with the marginalization of people who are educated, who may be successful &c by anti-elitists anti-art snobs. it's like when someone makes a post about somebody who might have sold something for a large sum of money, the peanut gallery comes out and makes all their comments. it's always done by the same handful of people, right on cue and really tiring, and drives people who are educated, and are successful away from this website. it's really too bad, because if I wanted to learn about the art world, how to make my art better, learn about artist statements, learn how to be successful, I wouldn't be letting "anti elitists" be the most vocal people on the website and have them drive away the people who know what they are talking about and are experienced.
craig75, not sure why you keep suggesting it's a game, it's not a game. is being able to talk about what and why you are doing what you are doing really that hard that it's got to be referred to as some sort of game ? I used to own a gallery with a handful of people, and we were not the type of place that required artist statements to hang things on the wall, we were the opposite. it was always a pleasure to be able to talk to people who were potential buyers about "the work" if we knew more about how, and why it was made. if educating oneself about the images or paintings or whatever is a game it's kind of necessary.
oh, I didn't know it was an art not art thing, sorry for my confusion. you'd think when someone compares themselves to Pablo Picasso and Antonio Gaudi they'd be able to write 4 sentences about what they are doing, seeing they are "that good" ...
btw, my comment about marginalizing people wasn't / isn't directed towards you ...
Double up the class load. ;-)
I took 3 studio art classes one semester and spent so much time on campus I considered getting a room in the dorms.
As for not having 7 years, are you saying that you know of or have exit plan?
these comments about artist statements on this website are nothing new. they are hand in glove with the marginalization of people who are educated, who may be successful &c by anti-elitists anti-art snobs. it's like when someone makes a post about somebody who might have sold something for a large sum of money, the peanut gallery comes out and makes all their comments. it's always done by the same handful of people, right on cue and really tiring, and drives people who are educated, and are successful away from this website. it's really too bad, because if I wanted to learn about the art world, how to make my art better, learn about artist statements, learn how to be successful, I wouldn't be letting "anti elitists" be the most vocal people on the website and have them drive away the people who know what they are talking about and are experienced.( even though some of these anti-art snobs claim to be more successful more educated &c &c)
craig75, not sure why you keep suggesting it's a game, it's not a game. is being able to talk about what and why you are doing what you are doing really that hard that it's got to be referred to as some sort of game ? I used to own a gallery with a handful of people, and we were not the type of place that required artist statements to hang things on the wall, we were the opposite. it was always a pleasure to be able to talk to people who were potential buyers about "the work" if we knew more about how, and why it was made. if educating oneself about the images or paintings or whatever is a game it's kind of necessary.
oh, I didn't know it was an art not art thing, sorry for my confusion. you'd think when someone compares themselves to Pablo Picasso and Antonio Gaudi they'd be able to write 4 sentences about what they are doing, seeing they are "that good" ...
btw, my comment about marginalizing people wasn't / isn't directed towards you ...
captions have absolutely nothing to do with artist statements.Often, captions under a photo are like an artist's statement trying to capture the audience. Such as, "Beautiful Sunset VIew" or "Fastest Dancer in Town." No point letting the photo just stand on its own when a few choice adjectives could help. Then, there are those nature shots of birds captioned, "Beautiful Blue Tits".
no I don't think I am harsh at all. I seem to have have more choice words to write but it fortunately my edit function is working.I think you are a little tough on the people who argue against artists' statements, that they might be superfluous. This forum is made up of many amateurs like myself who may not see the point. Being an open forum means that you're going to get views all over the place. Their views are just as valid as yours.
Well, even if I have at least the seven years, God willing, I might forget more than I remember from the course.
Well, even if I have at least the seven years, God willing, I might forget more than I remember from the course.
I wonder if Edward Weston every wrote an artist's statement. Probably not. His pictures were his statement. But if you asked I'm sure he could tell you.
In a letter, he probably covered much of what would be considered an artist statement.I don't think Atget ever wrote an artist's statement either.
Maybe if someone is unable to, or refuses t, write an artist statement, they aren’t an artist.
Thanks, at 77, I don't think I have 7 years.
In a letter, he probably covered much of what would be considered an artist statement.
"Atget wrote to Paul Léon, minister of fine arts, to offer for sale a portion of his negative collection. The letter begins, “Sir, for more than twenty years I have been working alone and of my own initiative in all the old streets of Old Paris to make a collection of 18 × 24 [centimetre] photographic negatives: artistic documents of beautiful urban architecture from the 16th to the 19th centuries.…Today this enormous artistic and documentary collection is finished; I can say that I possess all of Old Paris.” ---link here.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?