It doesn't really matter if it was last week, 2 years ago or 100 years ago, if somebody is going to retail your work they need to know what you were thinking and why you made the photographs so they can express these things to the potential buyer. you'd have to be able to say more than "I like puppies" even if they were all photographs of puppies.
I was in New York around Christmas 1979, and, in addition to visiting museums and galleries, I went to this, for lack of a better word, store that sold original photographs, photographic books, museum and gallery posters of photographic exhibits, and the like. They had an original Moonrise Hernandez which as I recall was around $1800. Well, I liked it a lot and was thinking about buying it, but since it represented 9-12 months rent, and I really didn't have the money, I reluctantly left with an Ansel Adams exhibit poster with his photograph of a hard boiled egg slicer, and a Dorothea Lange exhibit poster of Migrant Mother as consolation prizes. I knew the story behind Migrant Mother so I really didn't need anyone to explain that to me. There were a couple of Ansel Adams posters to chose from, but I liked his photograph of a hard boiled egg slicer best. I still have no idea why he took a photograph of it or what it means. It looks pretty much like a hard boiled egg slicer to me. The poster is in my darkroom, and it serves as a continual source of inspiration. So if anyone knows what it means, for God's sake don't tell me and ruin it.
sadly whomever it is that TFC is talking to I can't see, but to quote a guy who bought a run down bungalow / house about 3/4 a mile down the road from me to flip in the early 2000s ( after he mowed the lawn and planted some flowers ), and he ran through a different realtor every 2weeks for 4 or 5 years, and eventually took a bath in his losses. I spoke to him on the phone once and he told me "there are realtors and there are realtors" ... Maybe TFC is referring to "fine art" that is sold in fancy galleries where the gallerists and their staff have certain expectations to be met in order for one to be audiences by the staff, very much like what stock agencies used to do by submitting like 4000 chromes before they would even consider talking to you. Like Renato said it is what it is... It doesn't really matter if it was last week, 2 years ago or 100 years ago, if somebody is going to retail your work they need to know what you were thinking and why you made the photographs so they can express these things to the potential buyer. they'd have to be able to say more than "he likes puppies" even if they were all photographs of puppies.
and besides. if someone says someone isn't making "art" that's their opinion, isn't it ? there are people who don't believe for 1 second Ansel Adams was making art, or someone like gary Winograd, and others who believe that's all they were creating. and never mind people like Rothko someone said in a thread here last fall that he was a hack kind of like saying they were making crap a 1st grader could make ... it's just option... trash treasure and all that.
People who write and use an artists statement want the world to believe that one can not do art without one….
Nice way to generalize.
I was just about to write the same thing. It describes the project which is usually a series of individual works that are on some common theme.
I just had my senior show and I provided an “exhibition statement” that put the work in a context that many viewers might not pick up. It allowed me to explain the personal nature of the work and what inspired it.
BTW, it was all abstract done by drawing, painting, mosaic, with one tradition photograph and a couple drawings with embedded cyanotypes. Without the statement someone might say “What’s with all the circles?”
In fact, during my oral defense, one of the faculty said that since the circle represents the female and the square represented the male, she saw two of my works, concentric circles in a square frame, as some kind of male domination of women. I told her that my work is primarily about form and I am influenced by the early Modernists who saw the circle as the perfect form and I certainly didn’t see it that way nor was that my intention. She wasn’t convinced that I wasn’t up to something. Sigh…….That’s OK, I am still graduating Summa Cum Laude.
Hardly constructive for members to be the art police on a forum of photographers though.
I don’t understand why an artist statement has to be controversial unless it’s just a feature of social media for some people to tell other people that whatever they are doing it’s wrong.
I am retired. I wanted to learn about the world of art to expand my understanding and, perhaps, improve my own work, not to mention to challenge my mind, something I am told we should all do as we age (I’m turning 70 next month.) To accomplish this I enrolled in a BFA program. As a Vietnam Era vet I get a tuition waiver so why not? As part of every studio class an artist statement is required for each critique. It’s sort of like how a couple research papers are required in each art history class. This is simply the way it is.
have you ever gone to a gallery opening and talked to a photographer or the gallerists who represents them? the statement is a jumping off point / 30 second elevator pitch to talk about what the images are about and why they were made. if you had a series of 20 of your best images that were part of a series would you be able to write a paragraph about what the images are, and why you took them, other than "I'm interested in this stuff so I took these photographs". that's the point of an artist statement.. might sound pretentious to some but for others it's the reason why and gives insights.
I don’t understand why an artist statement has to be controversial unless it’s just a feature of social media for some people to tell other people that whatever they are doing it’s wrong.
I am retired. I wanted to learn about the world of art to expand my understanding and, perhaps, improve my own work, not to mention to challenge my mind, something I am told we should all do as we age (I’m turning 70 next month.) To accomplish this I enrolled in a BFA program. As a Vietnam Era vet I get a tuition waiver so why not? As part of every studio class an artist statement is required for each critique. It’s sort of like how a couple research papers are required in each art history class. This is simply the way it is.
Fine Art is what we forum types pontificate about on boring rainy days when we have nothing better to do. Well, it's not raining yet, and when it is forecast tonite, I'll probably be asleep anyway, thank goodness.
"Artist Statements" are an outgrowth of those corny old "Mission Statement" posters in the entry hallways of businesses and corporations in the 80's, invented so that otherwise worthless Marketing MBA's had something to do on boring rainy days.
Yeah, customs have probably changed
I'm a Viet Vet too. How does the tuition waiver work and how much?
It depends on each state. Here in Montana, any resident Vietnam Era vet can attend any state school and receive a tuition waiver. The student still has to pay the fees though. Also in Montana, any resident 65 years and older gets a waiver.
All that said, I’ve taken 7 years to do my BFA since I was in no hurry. I also got detoured and took a semester off to have cancer treatment. So when it was all totaled up (which I haven’t done but my wife, the CPA, probably has) I think it was under $10K. That included all the fees and all the stuff I bought: film developer, paint, papers, tools, etc., etc. That was pretty a pretty inexpensive adventure for me. Also, being a student gives me access to all the stuff on campus. The pool at the gym was what I was interested in.
As far as I know the waiver applies to an unlimited number of degrees one might want. And, you don’t even have to work toward a degree. We can audit classes for something like $5 a credit. However, you can’t audit studio art classes so regular enrollment is required.
Related to the artist statement is the “artist talk.” They tend to be an expansion of the artist statement and, in most cases, can be followed by Q&A.
Thanks, at 77, I don't think I have 7 years.
People who write and use an artists statement want the world to believe that one can not do art without one, however from cave man on through the Reconnaissance and up to now people have produced are without an "Artist's Statement". Hence an "Artist's Statement" is not an "if and only if" requirement. I seriously doubt that Picasso or Gaudi ever had such a document. If they did not need on then I do not need one.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?