Nice shot. Yosemite is magical.One thing I like about slide film is that unlike negative film that must be inverted and interpreted with curves (and in the case of color neg, several curves for each channel) the slide is just there. Also, in the case of the specific slide film of velvia 50, I get some really lovely brilliant purple tones I have a hard time getting with other films. This accurately reflects my memory of the moment, and the scan accurately reflects (or should I say transmits) the slide. For example: https://www.flickr.com/photos/132764966@N03/49068208736/in/dateposted-public/
6x6 capable projectors work fine with 6x4.5 slides - the exterior dimensions of the mounts (7x7) are the same, while the opening window differs.Man, you guys are making me regret not picking up a slide projector I saw at a thrift store.
I've never seen a medium format projector. Do they adjust for different formats?
Drew Wiley has posted that he has had success creating inter-negatives using Portra 160 (IIRC) but I expect that special Drew-like techniques would be required to minimize the build-up of contrast.Another approach would be using a inter-negative. But as with direct-printing the apt materials long ago had been cancelled.
My Linhof 67 projector cost $100 only a few years ago. Actually made by leitz. As far as I can tell except for finish, only difference is external finish and slide carrier. Of course these are complicated manual, which I prefer because only part to wear out is me6x6 capable projectors work fine with 6x4.5 slides - the exterior dimensions of the mounts (7x7) are the same, while the opening window differs.
Larger sizes are more of a problem because 6x7 projectors are relatively rare and expensive.
There are 4x5 and larger projectors that originally were used in lecture halls - fun but rare and relatively impractical.
Overhead projectors can be effectively re-purposed for larger transparencies, although the quality is a bit iffy.
And you are fortunate to have found it, particularly at that price.My Linhof 67 projector cost $100 only a few years ago.
May I ask which film / process you use for BW?[...] nothing is as striking as a projected image on a big screen, whether color or BW.
I use the same process as I use for processing 16mm and Super8: D19 is developer I use. Discontinued by Kodak, but easy to make.May I ask which film / process you use for BW?
I am only aware of the ADOX Scala (160 and 50 ISO, but only in 35mm...) http://www.adox.de/Photo/adox-scala/
Is there anything else?
Thanks for this very detailes answer!I use the same process as I use for processing 16mm and Super8: D19 is developer I use.
I display digitized scanned film photos on my 75" 4K UHD TV. I no longer have a slide projector as it broke. But I believe from memory, TV slide shows are better than anything I displayed with my slide project (35mm). Contrast and colors are superb. It's certainly is more convenient and you can add video clips, titles, credits, narration, and music as part of the show. Of course, my wife yells at me when I suggest showing some of them to unsuspecting guests. But that was the same with projected slide shows decades ago as well.Projected slide is the proof of the unquestionable superiority of film as an image medium.
Even half frame projected slide has more contrast, far better colours, incredible pleasant resolution than anything digital, and image stability that reminds you of the first time you saw an e-reader.
Basically you are probably never going to wet print as large as you’d project. And the slide is also a first generation copy.
So while not as convenient as print. Slide represents in many ways the ultimate film output technology.
Remember, the basic slide before exposure has all of the latitude of normal film. It’s only in the standardized E6 development that things are frozen. That’s why DR and latitude is less with slide.
It’s basically equivalent to a finished print, which has even less dynamic range.
Same as when you print, you need to manipulate and compress the range, in this case in-camera.
Gradated ND filters and polarizers are excellent tools in that regard.
Preflashing the slide is also a possibility to bring global contrast down.
Medium format slide is out of this world good.
It’s real frozen VR.
Speaking of VR, does a goggle slide viewer exist that acts as a giant projection screen?
There are viewers of course, but they all have in common that the slide is displayed quite small.
I display digitized scanned film photos on my 75" 4K UHD TV. I no longer have a slide projector as it broke. But I believe from memory, TV slide shows are better than anything I displayed with my slide project (35mm). Contrast and colors are superb. It's certainly is more convenient and you can add video clips, titles, credits, narration, and music as part of the show. Of course, my wife yells at me when I suggest showing some of them to unsuspecting guests. But that was the same with projected slide shows decades ago as well.
With modern TV's, you can adjust the contrast, saturation, color, darker blacks, etc. to meet the conditions of the space, time of day or night, ambient lighting, etc. You really can't do that with a slide projector. Also, a TV emits light so the contrast is much greater and brighter than a slide projector that reflects light even if you've been able to secure a good screen. Displaying on a white wall just dulls it more. Also, with digitally projected slides, you can remove scratches and dust permanently so you have a cleaner look with TV, if that's what you like. I'm not opposed to slide projection. It has its own qualities and tradition. But I learned that there are many advantages to scanning slides and projecting them digitally that makes this method superior in many ways. But this shouldn't devolve into a digital vs film debate.Of course as with any kind of projection contrast is a question of how dark you can make the room.
Real contrast/dmax of a well shot quality slide is incredibly high.
Much depends on the quality and power of the projector and the size you project to, too of course.
Resolution, colour resolution and image stability is somewhat independent of global contrast tough.
A backlit slide in a goggle display device or on a light table will display all the contrast inherent in the medium too, without the dependence in room light.
What kind of a screen were you using? How big was the projected image?As a matter of fact I have tried a 250W projector next to a good OLED screen in a dark room at similar screen size.
The projector blew the screen clean out of the water.
If you want to view non printed images, and learn to adjust your slides in-camera, with choice of film, filters and correct metering. Then slide will give you an end display experience that is not and probably will never in our lifetime, be equaled by any other display technology.
Negative film has much better dynamics that can be compressed into a print to your hearts desire, and better resolution too.
But you’d have to make one hell of a print to equal a projected first gen. slide.
It was a Sony OLED from last year. The model name escapes me.What kind of a screen were you using? How big was the projected image?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?