Hello, I am new to photography and I have a vintage Weston light meter it works fine, but gives an all over average exposure.
I want to start using the Zone system so
1: Do I need a spot meter? and
2: if so what would be a good one to get, I do not want to spend loads and also I have heard about the K Factor and I really don't want that to be added. Anything that is changed I want to do it.
Paul
May you have many thousands of satisfying photographs ahead of you, Paul!
All meters give an average reading and this is where you make decisions based on what the meter
suggests.
There are many meters available ranging from a couple of hundred to almost a $1000. The Zone System works on the principal of assessing luminance over a given area (the scene you are about to photograph) and is chiefly more useful for we interchanging LF photographers, but it also has its uses in 35mm (along a compacted Zone scale, especially with tranny stock).
Be aware that the Zone System works on visualising values (or tones). We humans see things in colour remember, but the ZS works on a scale of white to black. It's not a "quick overnight job" to learn Uncle Adams' baby, but more like several years of patient trial and error, likely wasted film, going back, repeating, reading etc (Three Rs: Rote, Repetition, Refinement).
Your budget and how persistent you are (now and into the future) will also determine what meter you get, rather than a preference for a spot or something else. True, the Pentax Spotmeter V is fine, so too, is the Sekonic L758D, which is around my neck as I type (!). Incident and reflective readings all have their specific use (emplying the ZS, I use spot predominantly with large format, intermittently with incident in 35mm).
APUG is of course a great place to bounce around ideas and theories.
