What gear for hiking?

If it were me, I wouldn't consider anything bigger and heavier than one of your Nikons.

Way I see it, if the purpose of your trip isn't specifically to take pictures, then photography is an incidental activity and it shouldn't unduly be weighing you down with extra mass that you're going to feel every step you take.

Just the Rollei 35T and nothing else is something I'd seriously consider if I was selecting from your kit. More likely though, I'd take the FM, 50mm 1.8, 28mm 2.5 and the Rollei. I'd prefer a longer prime for the Nikon, but you don't own one. The FM brings reasonably compact flexibility to the game while the Rollei is both a lightweight backup and much faster to deploy in certain circumstances. SLR or not, I'd leave the tripod at home unless it was a very light carbon fiber unit.

These suggestions are naturally based on my own preferences and biases, but you asked.

I recommend you look for Kodak Ektar for a fine-grained, saturated negative film. B&W gets too subjective to really make many suggestions.

 

Mamiya 6/6mf/7/7ii.
Fuji GW/GSW 670 or 690.
Fuji GA 645zi.

Rangefinders... they are your best hiking buddies

There is no colour neg film with velviaesque qualities. Use velvia if you want velviaesque qualities Ektar is not anywhere near velvia in colour rendition, in my experience... not even close. Maybe try reala 100 rated a third stop slower if it must be c41?

B&W film for hiking... I think I'd go with fp4+/hp5+. In my case, the slower films don't seem to find as much use when I am out hiking. Especially if you are going to shoot medium format, you may as well tote something with a bit more speed than pan f, in my opinion. Unless you plan to schlepp a tripod too.

 

If you really want landscapes in color, I'd take the Rollei. It is very bulky, but not heavy. The large negatives have the potential to get good landscapes hand-held with no tripod.

The other way I'd go is to take the lightest, smallest camera; the Yashica RF or the Minolta point-n-shoot. Either way, you get to take pictures. No tripod to regret. Any decent tripod is going to be way too heavy for any backpacking trip which is not specifically dedicated for getting photos.

An old hiker's trick is to use a hiking pole as a monopole. There are adapters, I think.

 

You must be a better man than I am to even consider the RB.

I'm planning a short backpacking trip in northern Minnesota, US. Hilly, but not mountainous. Just me and the dog - though she promised to carry her own food.

I'm struggling to get my pack weight down to a reasonable weight. I can't decide whether to take a 6x9 folder, my Rollei 35S, and/or a small P&S with 28-70 zoom. Will probably take the 6x9 and Rollei; along with a Gossen Pilot. Long lenses will be largely useless here. In fact, my concern with the Rollei and 6x9 combination is that I won't have anything wider than 40mm.

Not sure if I'll take color print or slide film. Will take some b/w also.

 

Uh, Dave, the OP owns a Rollei 35T, not a Rollei TLR. That Rollei probably is the smallest, lightest camera he's got.

 

Oops! I was thinking of a 3.5 TLR. Nevermind.

 

I'm going to be doing an overnight (or two nights) in the Victorian Alps with a friend of mine from APUG and I'll be taking my 8x10 Tachihara, Manfrotto 075 tripod with 3 way head, 10 film holders, light meter, filters, plus a sleeping bag, food and a small tent. All up about 35-40 kg. Nowe who's mad?
Mike

 

Less is more. Take this from a guy who drags way too much gear to wilderness.

How long trip will this be? For overnight trips it is possible to drag almost anything. For three week trip I would try to go as light as possible. If you backpack weighs too much you will be too tired to take photographs.

When I was young and stupid (not young anymore) I carried a Nikon F4 with three lenses and a Manfrotto 190 trip along with 21 days of food and camping supplies. Now it's small DSLR with two lenses, very small gitzo and trips are getting shorter also. I'm seriously thinking about something with a fixed lens and no tripod.

 

Take the Nikon FM, sell the Chinon and buy a ext tube to do macro . Rules that work for me - To much gear will ruin trip, if its in your bag you won't use it.

 

Take it all. Plus a good, heavy tripod. (This is from a guy who just spent two weeks backpacking in the High Sierra with a Pentax 67).

Kris

 

The N80 would be my first choice, along with the 50mm and 28mm prime. You could pick up an N75 for a song and keep one for color, one for B&W. Don't forget a polarizer. If you use Ektar with a polarizer you get Velvia, but no slides to project and wow your friends with when you get back.

 

How much do the latter figure in your plans? If you are quite serious about close-up work, an SLR would have an advantage over the rangefinders.

 

Throw out the knife, fork, & spoon set and buy yourself a lightweight titanium spork instead. Then have a look at the cooking gear - A single Ti pan is enough, and you can cook over a pepsi can stove. Tent pegs can be made from sticks laying around, and you can cut out poles by using your tripod as the main support.

Now you can think about packing the RB67

Remember - If your camping gear weighs more than the camera kit, either pick a lighter tent or get a bigger camera

 

Take the rb67. If you really want to take it, just deal with the extra weight. I'd rather regret having too much with me than too little.

 

Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry8330/4.3.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/105)

I agree with taking the FM and a couple of primes. I'm surprised so many people recommend not taking a tripod. Your FM kit gives you the lens flexibility and weight/size advantages, but the tripod will get you the quality enlargements you were looking for with the RB. I'd pack a compact gitzo in a heartbeat.

B.t.w., Wyno, that list of stuff you hauled around made my back hurt just reading it!

 

The choices I have made are in bold below:

*Mamiya RB67 (only one back unfortunately and the 90 mm C)
*Nikon FM (50/1.8, 28-80/3.5-4.5,28/2.5)
*Chinon CX (no batteries, and no 1.35 available before leaving. 135/2.8, 28-80/a lot + macro, 55/1.7 and a few other slow lenses)
*Rollei 35 T (40/3.5 scale focus)
*Yashica lynx 14E (45/1.4 range finder)
*Nikon F80 (N80 in the us) (same lenses as the FM plus a G 70-300/4.5-5.6)
*Minolta something point-and-shoot.

For these choices (not the BIG Mama Mamiya!), add a small tripod (the lighter the better i.e. carbon fibre)

Believe me it's no fun carrying 11kg of cameras on your back through untracked country, fording rivers, slogging uphill and bashing through tangled undergrowth; I tend to pack light now..
I guess, though, Wyno will beg to differ...

 

If I recall correctly, Wyno's kit weighs in at 30kg+ ! You read it right...

 

Who's mad!?
Well, son, I feel something is very, very wrong somewhere. But if you enjoy it (and more importantly can haul it!), we mere mortals salute you!

EDIT: Mount Feathertop on 17-18th October (I'm in so far), or something else????

 

I love it.

 

I went on a day walk with Poisson du jour (Gary Higgins) and SMBooth (Shane) on Sunday to the Otway Ranges here in Victoria. There had been 40 mils of rain the day before, so it was quite wet. I took the 8x10 tqchihara and holders and Manfrotto 075 tripod, about 30+ kg. Gary took a digi pic of me just before we started out. I have attached it for your enjoyment. Ignore the pained look on my face, I was just imagining what I was going to feel like after we got back from our 6 k hike.
Mike


http://users.ncable.net.au/~higgins1/_APUG/Trans-Otway Waterfall Walk/album/slides/IMG_2552.html

 

I'm not a landscape photographer, but I do recall that when I was in the military many years ago I learned that it had been accepted since the middle ages that the maximum a infantryman could carry for a days march, and still be fit for combat is about 60 Lb, I always bear this in mind before I load my camera bags.