What do you think happened in these photos?

Lacock Abbey detail

A
Lacock Abbey detail

  • 0
  • 1
  • 21
Tyndall Bruce

A
Tyndall Bruce

  • 0
  • 0
  • 39
TEXTURES

A
TEXTURES

  • 4
  • 0
  • 65
Small Craft Club

A
Small Craft Club

  • 2
  • 0
  • 60
RED FILTER

A
RED FILTER

  • 1
  • 0
  • 51

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,905
Messages
2,782,822
Members
99,743
Latest member
HypnoRospo
Recent bookmarks
0

PGraham3

Member
Joined
May 18, 2016
Messages
294
Location
Seoul, South Korea
Format
35mm
I picked up a Fujica ST801 some time ago with a 55/1.8 EBC Fujinon lens + Skylight 1A Filter, and recently put a new roll of Fuji Superia X-TRA 400 through it. The camera lens is clean. It was a pretty sunny day, and this 400 film was probably not the best choice for the occasion as I got shots with more than half the image overexposed.
The camera lens is clear, but the shutter has not been gauged, and I do have a hunch that the 1/2000 is not quite up to speed. The overexposed parts also appear similar spots, which could indicate a light leak. Thus, as this happened several times throughout the roll, by the looks of these pictures could this be a film issue, camera vibration as there is no mirror padding, shutter issue, light leak, or simple overexposure, etc?

Any observations will be helpful. Thanks!
-Paul

I recall the first and second photos were taken at f5.6 1/2000.
000006 copy.jpg


000013 copy.jpg

000010 copy.jpg

000011 copy.jpg
 

Naples

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
199
Location
Naples, Florida
Format
35mm
The band of light repeating in the same area would indicate to me a light leak or other mechanical failure.
 

StepheKoontz

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2018
Messages
801
Location
Doraville
Format
Medium Format
Is this a vertical shutter? If so this looks like shutter banding, which is more likely at high speeds.
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
Could we see the negative? If it's a light leak, you'll see exposure outside the frame area
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,372
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Camera malfunction. ISO 400 film should have been able to hand the scenes if and only if the light meter and shutter were working properly.
 

Chan Tran

Subscriber
Joined
May 10, 2006
Messages
6,821
Location
Sachse, TX
Format
35mm
It's light leak rather than shutter malfunction. If the shutter malfunction and expose one part of the film more than other then you would have overexposure but this is not. It's simply fog and not too much exposure.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,008
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
This camera appears to use a horizontal cloth shutter, so unless there are holes in a shutter curtain, this doesn't look like a shutter problem.
Dare I ask if the light parts are visible in the negative? This could be a scanning problem.
Otherwise I'd look for a light leak or some source of flare or reflection in the camera or at the lens mount.
 
OP
OP
PGraham3

PGraham3

Member
Joined
May 18, 2016
Messages
294
Location
Seoul, South Korea
Format
35mm
@Theo Sulphate
I currently don’t have quick access to the negatives as they get stored at the developer’s shop in the middle of Seoul where I mail-in my film.
@Chan Tran
If it’s fog, wouldn’t it show up on most of the other photos as well? Most of the other photos came out well.
@StepheKoontz
This Fujica has a horizontal-run focal plane shutter. Can shutter banding still occur?
@MattKing
Sorry, no quick access to the negatives. Would you suggest a rescan to developer to see if that was the issue?
Also, camera almost doesn’t have any light seals remaining as it has been corroded.

All in all, I’d say about only about 6-7 shots have this issue.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,008
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
@MattKing
Sorry, no quick access to the negatives. Would you suggest a rescan to developer to see if that was the issue?
Also, camera almost doesn’t have any light seals remaining as it has been corroded.
Without access to the negatives, anything we say here would be nothing more than a wild guess.
So many of these sorts of problems arise at, or are contributed to by, the scanning stage.
 

Chan Tran

Subscriber
Joined
May 10, 2006
Messages
6,821
Location
Sachse, TX
Format
35mm
If the light seal is bad it's fogged but only when your're in bright sun. I have similar problem with my XD-11 and replacing the foam fixed the problem.
 
OP
OP
PGraham3

PGraham3

Member
Joined
May 18, 2016
Messages
294
Location
Seoul, South Korea
Format
35mm
My developer replied and said that it is not a scanning problem as these overexposed parts appear on the negative as well. He mentioned that is appears to be a camera body problem, such as worn out light seals or maybe even something called "diffused reflection". He sent me a link in Korean as a reference (http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=film_forum&no=96823). If a reflection problem, he mentioned that it can be reduced by using a lens hood, etc.

My hunch is that it's a light seal issue. However, what do you all think? Diffused reflection?

-Paul
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,008
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Diffused reflection is probably just flare from light sources outside of the image area that reaches the surface of the lens - and a lens hood is an excellent solution, as is careful attention to the position and direction of the camera.
But light seals are certainly a potential source as well.
By the way, that is an excellent response from a photo lab.
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
I currently don’t have quick access to the negatives as they get stored at the developer’s shop in the middle of Seoul where I mail-in my film.
...

What is the rationale for the lab keeping negatives? People can learn so much from examining the negatives. The negatives are the photo; the print is far less important.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,667
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
@Theo Sulphate
Seoul is a huge city, and this particular photo lab is in the middle of the city. They hold up to 70 rolls of negatives for me until I can actually cruise by and get them. It's a very convenient service.
-Paul
That's pretty nice service!

There's several people on Ebay that sell seals. I bought a pre cut kit for a camera from a nice fellow in Germany. There was enough material I fixed a couple cameras, still have some. If I can do it anyone can do it
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
@Theo Sulphate
Seoul is a huge city, and this particular photo lab is in the middle of the city. They hold up to 70 rolls of negatives for me until I can actually cruise by and get them. It's a very convenient service.
-Paul

So they're not mailing you prints? I assume they're not, otherwise they'd mail the negatives as well. They provide the "prints" online?

They must have a lot of storage space to hold up to 70 rolls for all their customers.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom