What difference does it make with a symmar??

Camel Rock

A
Camel Rock

  • 3
  • 0
  • 28
Wattle Creek Station

A
Wattle Creek Station

  • 4
  • 0
  • 36
Cole Run Falls

A
Cole Run Falls

  • 2
  • 2
  • 29
Clay Pike

A
Clay Pike

  • 4
  • 1
  • 32

Forum statistics

Threads
198,938
Messages
2,783,512
Members
99,751
Latest member
lyrarapax
Recent bookmarks
0

chiller

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2005
Messages
235
Location
Adelaide Aus
Format
Multi Format
Does anyone have experience with the convertible Symmar lenses?
I have a 150/265 and wonder what difference there is using the back element removed as opposed to removing the front element?

I suppose I would rather keep the shutter/iris protected with the front element if possible?
 

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,245
Location
Bergen, Norway
Format
Large Format
The difference is:

About one stop less aperture (f:15 instead of f:12)

Longer focal length

More aberration (a LOT more)

Shorter bellows draw

More distortion (quite a bit more)

And you'll be pumping dust into the shutter/iris with the bellows instead of letting it settle (visibly) from the outside.

That much being said, I've used my 240/420 with the rear removed (or rather rear cell in front threads) simply because my camera doesn't have enough bellows to do it correctly.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom