What difference does it make with a symmar??

Sciuridae II

A
Sciuridae II

  • 0
  • 0
  • 7
Untitled

H
Untitled

  • 1
  • 0
  • 21
Between two trees.

H
Between two trees.

  • 0
  • 0
  • 16
Stark

A
Stark

  • 9
  • 6
  • 108

Forum statistics

Threads
197,724
Messages
2,763,379
Members
99,453
Latest member
Minihdoka
Recent bookmarks
0

chiller

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2005
Messages
234
Location
Adelaide Aus
Format
Multi Format
Does anyone have experience with the convertible Symmar lenses?
I have a 150/265 and wonder what difference there is using the back element removed as opposed to removing the front element?

I suppose I would rather keep the shutter/iris protected with the front element if possible?
 

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,244
Location
Bergen, Norway
Format
Large Format
The difference is:

About one stop less aperture (f:15 instead of f:12)

Longer focal length

More aberration (a LOT more)

Shorter bellows draw

More distortion (quite a bit more)

And you'll be pumping dust into the shutter/iris with the bellows instead of letting it settle (visibly) from the outside.

That much being said, I've used my 240/420 with the rear removed (or rather rear cell in front threads) simply because my camera doesn't have enough bellows to do it correctly.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom