What did I do wrong with this B&W reversal?

Ivo Stunga

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Messages
1,223
Location
Latvia
Format
35mm
Oh, ok - my bad then and thanks for clarification!
 

Ivo Stunga

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Messages
1,223
Location
Latvia
Format
35mm
And yes - already processed slide dumped in Kala Namak doesn't tone like at all - needs something strong like hot double espresso, tea or whiskey - E-6 slides in my previous link were toned that way.
 

isaac7

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2019
Messages
53
Location
Virginia
Format
Med. Format RF
And yes - already processed slide dumped in Kala Namak doesn't tone like at all - needs something strong like hot double espresso, tea or whiskey - E-6 slides in my previous link were toned that way.

I have been intrigued by the idea of bleaching a finished B&W slide with a rehalogenating dichromate bleach and then redeveloping with a sepia toner. @koraks uses the process to increase density and contrast with his negatives but not with a sepia toner. I have never heard of anyone doing it positives but it would seem like an obvious thing to try if dmax and contrast are the weak points of your positives.
 

isaac7

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2019
Messages
53
Location
Virginia
Format
Med. Format RF

Wood also preferred using a fogging developer. In his test of the Ilford process that @Ivo Stunga hates so much, there was a lot of unevenness. That could very well have been from inconsistent light exposure. Did he do it on purpose, was lazy, or just did it once and didn’t try to optimize? Who knows. He has mentioned online that fogging developers give more consistent results. I imagine that is even more important when you are running lots of film through the process. It would be a pain to incorporate a light re-exposure step with a dip and dunk processor.

While Wood didn’t use any silver solvents in his first developer it looks like D-11 has a lot of sulfates (sulfites?) in it which could be doing the same thing. Man, I wish I could actually be doing this stuff instead of just theorizing about it. Sigh.
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
24,747
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
@koraks uses the process to increase density and contrast with his negatives but not with a sepia toner.
When I did wet plate collodion, I would sometimes intensify by using a copper sulfate bleach and then redevelop in sepia. It wasn't reversal of course; kind of a similar principle though.
 

Ivo Stunga

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Messages
1,223
Location
Latvia
Format
35mm

Have no problems whatsoever with a long fluorescent 25W tube from 30cm distance for a minute or two per side. In commercial setting taking out a film and exposing evenly to light would be total pain, agreed.
 

flavio81

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,147
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format
That's interesting since it was mentioned earlier that the sepia redevelopment would have been at high temperature. It's possible that the thermostat for that bath was hacked/modified.

Somebody said "60 degrees". If this was Celsius, then I think this is way too much and the thermal shock would cause all kinds of problems with most films.

I think they meant "60 degrees" in Freedom units, which would equate to 15.56 Celsius.

"Stop". See earlier discussion on the need to instantly stop development for archival purposes.

This makes sense, thanks. It mus be the stop bath.

I'm not sure on "FT".

Perhaps "Fourier Transform". Or since this is a reversal process, "Inverse Fourier Transform".

However, since it comes after the fixer, it is probably some hypo removal / hypo clearing step.
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
24,747
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
I think they meant "60 degrees" in Freedom units, which would equate to 15.56 Celsius.
Good point. 62f would be around 16.6C.

Perhaps "Fourier Transform". Or since this is a reversal process, "Inverse Fourier Transform".
LOL!
Yeah, it's probably some kind of hypo clear/wash aid step. Or perhaps something like Sistan.
 

Tumbles

Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2016
Messages
124
Location
SF Bay Area
Format
Med. Format RF
The part of the DR5 process that stands out to me, is the bleach 1 and bleach 2. I've read that's he's using a dichromate bleach. What could be going on there?
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
24,747
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
What could be going on there?
Just a guess, but it might be as trivial as two identical baths back to back to ensure the process goes to completion. Equivalent to a single bath that runs longer. I imagine the time per bath is constant, so that would be a difficult parameter to manipulate, especially since it's likely that the time per bath is basically controlled by the film travel speed (and of course number of loops per bath, but this would be physically limited), so if you were to adjust the time of one process step this would affect all others too. Just thinking out loud.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…