- Joined
- Dec 14, 2004
- Messages
- 1,662
- Format
- Multi Format
The slower tungsten speeds reflect the lower sensitivity of these films to red light.rusty71 said:One very curious thing is that the 25 and 50 emuslsions are slightly faster outside or with strong UV light. If you really dig, you'll see that the box speeds are for Tungsten light. You can shoot R25 at ISO 32 and R50 at 64-80 ISO outside in strong sun or open shade.
Slow films like Efke 25 are inherently contrasty. You would see this problem with Efke 50 or Ilford PanF+.ongarine said:I do not like too much the contrasty in most negatives.
P C Headland said:I love Efke R25 in Rodinal 1+100 for 18 minutes
Just right for scanning (flatbed), & they look just gorgeous.VoidoidRamone said:18 minutes?! wow, even when I shoot R25 at EI 25 I still only develop for about 10min in rodinal 1:100. How dense are your negatives?
-Grant
I just ordered each of the three speeds of 120 Efke rollfilm from J and C. I know there is a development chart on the site that lists times for a variety of developers, but I would like to hear what particular developer you think brings out the particular qualities of these films. I know that advice from others is no replacement for me just trying out several different formulas on my own, but right now I would like to find out what others think a particular developer "brings to the table" for Efke films. I.e., If you like X result, try Y developer. I would then have some starting points to begin my own experimentation. I plan to do some portraits with the first few rolls. Thanks for any help ya'll can give me. Sunny
A minor note regarding studio portraiture using Efke R25 rated at ISO 50 shot under strobes (up to 3 stops difference between key and fill) -- P/F TD-3 (Tropp's pyrocat formulation specifically for TechPan), normal dilution, agitation B, 21 min., 68F, yields incredible gradation with very fine grain.
Last night I developed two sheets of Efke PL 100 in W2D2+ pyro and the stain was a lot nicer than Efke KB25. I have yet to print these, but they look promising!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?