Well, that was easy...

[Jim Blodgett]

BTW, someone has confused you (quite possibly by intent). A roll of 120 is the same area, near enough, as a 135 36 exposure (or four sheets of 4x5 or a single 8x10). Your chemicals should be able to handle the same number of rolls of either size. I don't know what brand you have or what volume of solution it makes; but Cinestill says their Cs-41 is good for 20 rolls. I'd have to go reread the instructions to check, but I'm almost certain they recommend adding time as you use up the capacity.

View attachment 244238

Yes, you're right. You got my curiosity up and I just reread the instructions. My suggested usage is the same number of rolls 120 as 35mm/36exp. They also recommend 50% more rolls of 35mm/24exp. I use 35mm so seldom it had slipped my mind that it was common for it to be sold either way. I must have read that chart a couple years ago whil e developing some 24 exp 35mm rolls and it just stuck.

Thanks for the reminder.

Edited to add I almost forgot to say how beautiful that photo is. I love the soft blue light behind the green and white foliage. Are those dogwood by any chance? Whatever they are, I love that photo. Nicely done.

 

[Donald Qualls]

Thanks! I believe that tree is a flowering crabapple. We have some dogwoods, but there aren't on that roll. Dogwoods are distinctive because they have four large white sepals, and the actual petals are so small you can't see them easily without magnification.

Most likely some would claim the blue cast suggests I screwed up in processing (since that's a completely uncorrected scan), but IMO it's more likely due to skylight. I'm pretty happy with the results, in any case, and really happy with the $40 camera.