Weird results from my film, maybe reticulation?

Harbour at dusk

A
Harbour at dusk

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
blossum in the night

D
blossum in the night

  • 1
  • 0
  • 35
Brown crested nuthatch

A
Brown crested nuthatch

  • 2
  • 1
  • 52
Double Self-Portrait

A
Double Self-Portrait

  • 7
  • 2
  • 147

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,714
Messages
2,779,712
Members
99,684
Latest member
delahp
Recent bookmarks
1

Matthew Wagg

Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
93
Location
Sandiacre, N
Format
Multi Format
Heya guys,
So I had a shoot a week or so ago in some local woods with a friend. I used my OM2 and Ilford Pan 400, shot at box speed and souped in d76 1+1 @20c.

As you can see from the shot here, they are a mite messed up. Is this reticulation.

I had the dev, stop and fix all at 20c but the wash water was straight out the tap and that is the only thing that is different was that the tap wash was cold. The weird thing for me is the almost solarisation effect in part of the negative but not in others.

Any ideas?

Scan-130209-0002sm.jpg
Scan-130209-0001sm.jpg
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Reticulation has a very distinctive pattern which I don't see in your samples. Additionally reticulation would effect the entire negative and not be spotty as in the sample. A low alkalinity developer like D-76 would not soften the emulsion to allow this to happen. With modern emulsions it is very hard to produce unintentionally.

Is there any milkiness in the negatives particularly toward the center which would indicate improper fixing?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Severely low contrast with streaks and blotches. Looks like bad fix and maybe foam in the developer along with some other problems.

PE
 

artonpaper

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
336
Location
Staten Island, New York
Format
Multi Format
I agree with worker 11811, weak or incomplete fix.

Just for the record, I've reticulated Tri- X several times when, after processing at 68º all the way through, my wash water ran very hot. Some sheets showed complete reticulation pattern, others, only portions of the sheet were reticulated, perhaps owing to the sheets of film rising above the surface during the washing.
 

pgomena

Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2003
Messages
1,391
Location
Portland, Or
I've accidentally reticulated Tri-X sheet film a couple of times. PMK developer followed by cold wash water. The alkalinity of the developer may have something to do with it.
 

BMbikerider

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
2,942
Location
UK
Format
35mm
In case it is a fixer problem then simply dunk it in the fixer again for 3-4 mins, if it is inadequate fixing it should clear.. For solarisation to take place it has to go back into the developer BEFORE FIXING which is not what happened here.
Reticulation will mainly be caused by going from one fluid - developer which is at a high temp into a much cooler temp fluid - fixer. Or vice versa. Modern emulsions are pretty well proof against that happening unless the temp extremes are well apart.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

dorff

Member
Joined
May 31, 2011
Messages
443
Location
South Africa
Format
Multi Format
In case it is a fixer problem then simply dunk it in the fixer again for 3-4 mins, if it is inadequate fixing it should clear.. For solarisation to take place it has to go back into the developer BEFORE FIXING which is not what happened here.

Correct. If fixing is incomplete, the negative will have a visible milkiness that should clear when re-fixed. Looking at the images, I think there could be developing problems as well. Partially exhausted developer, inconsistent agitation, foaming are some of the potential problems. I do not think it is temperature-induced reticulation. To the OP: Are you using fresh chemicals? If your fixer is showing any sign of sulphur precipitating out (i.e. yellow crystals or milkiness in the fixer) it must be replaced. Is your developer fresh? You know the D76 guidelines: 2 months if opened; 6 months in a full stoppered bottle. Anything beyond that is a gamble.

As for the film: What is Ilford Pan 400? Is it old film? I know only HP5+ and Delta 400. If the film is very old, it should not be used at box speed. One can add a stop for every ten years or so. And from my experience with old film, D76 is not the best developer for that. Maybe try HC-110 rather.
 
OP
OP
Matthew Wagg

Matthew Wagg

Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
93
Location
Sandiacre, N
Format
Multi Format

dorff

Member
Joined
May 31, 2011
Messages
443
Location
South Africa
Format
Multi Format
Thanks for the link. I've never seen it before, so I've learned something! I order most of my stuff from B&H, and locally in South Africa the variety is limited to the mainstream products. If you get the developing sorted and your results improve, I would like to know your opinion on this film. Obviously, if it is in-date film, then D76 should not be a problem. I made the HC-110 comment on the basis that it is the developer that consistently produces the lowest fog for me. There are some newer emulsions like Rollei RPX400 and Kentmere's 400 that I also develop with it as those tend to fog in most other developers, Rodinal being the worst, but D76 also not that great.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom