Watson loader goof up - scratched film?

Tower and Moon

A
Tower and Moon

  • 1
  • 0
  • 450
Light at Paul's House

A
Light at Paul's House

  • 2
  • 2
  • 517
Slowly Shifting

Slowly Shifting

  • 0
  • 0
  • 526
Waiting

Waiting

  • 1
  • 0
  • 554

Forum statistics

Threads
199,723
Messages
2,795,626
Members
100,010
Latest member
Ntw20ntw
Recent bookmarks
1

agenkin

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
49
Location
Toronto, Ont
Format
35mm
I was bulk-loading Ilford HP5+ using the Watson 100 bulk loader. I loaded an entire roll when I realized that I forgot to open up the gate. This means that I dragged the entire roll through the closed gate. Do you suppose the roll is now scratched up badly? My feeling is that it should be, but I decided to ask just in case. :smile:
 

fschifano

Member
Joined
May 12, 2003
Messages
3,196
Location
Valley Strea
Format
Multi Format
Yeah, probably. Didn't you notice that the film was particularly difficult to wind into the cassettes?
 

film_guy

Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
258
Location
Canada
Format
35mm
I think best thing is to cut a tiny strip and develop it to see if it's scratched up.
 

patrickjames

Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Messages
742
Format
Multi Format
You should be able to see if there are any abrasions on the film without developing it. Otherwise just throw it out or save it for some testing.

As an aside, I have noticed with the Watson loader that you shouldn't open the film gate all the way, just until there is resistance (not until it clicks), This cuts down on abrasions as well.

Good luck

Patrick
 
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Messages
105
Format
35mm
I don't like watson bulk loaders anyhow, they are prone to scratching the f**k out of your film.
 

Neal

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 3, 2004
Messages
2,020
Location
Chicago, West Suburbs
Format
Multi Format
Dear Arkady,

I avoid the film gate problem by never closing it. I work in the dark (often in a changing bag while watching television).

Neal Wydra
 
OP
OP

agenkin

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
49
Location
Toronto, Ont
Format
35mm
I don't like watson bulk loaders anyhow, they are prone to scratching the f**k out of your film.

This sounds strange; which ones do you think are better? The alternatives that use felt for light trapping seem to have more contact with the film than the Watsons, which open the gate wide open so that (I think) it doesn't touch anything when traveling.
 

Jim Jones

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
3,740
Location
Chillicothe MO
Format
Multi Format
Dear Arkady,

I avoid the film gate problem by never closing it. I work in the dark (often in a changing bag while watching television).

Neal Wydra

Me too. A radio (or cd player) eliminates the need for a changing bag and TV. Maybe a patient photographer can even do it in total solitude and silence. There is no chance of fogging the final frame. A desk tape dispenser would be handy, but just hanging the roll of tape on an enlarger knob works, too.
 

T42

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2006
Messages
127
Location
Georgia, USA
Format
35mm
Loaders and Bulk Film rolls

Greetings, Folks.

Originally Posted by radiantdarkroom
I don't like watson bulk loaders anyhow, they are prone to scratching...

I am just trying to figure out which bulk loader is the choice of Members here at APUG, if any are significantly better than any others, or if there are any surprises I should be aware of. I have decided to load my own rolls after using factory spooled cassettes for decades.

I also have a concern about buying 100 ft rolls of film which must be shipped to me, if bought in August. I wonder what the experts here think about potential heat damage in transit. Is it an issue worth being concerned about?

Thanks!
Henry
 

Moopheus

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
1,219
Location
Cambridge MA
Format
Medium Format
IThis means that I dragged the entire roll through the closed gate. Do you suppose the roll is now scratched up badly?

When I did that just a couple of weeks ago ((there was a url link here which no longer exists)) the scratches were deep and nasty. Pretty much ruined the film.
 

fotch

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2005
Messages
4,774
Location
SE WI- USA
Format
Multi Format
Its all in the technique. I like the Watson the best however, they all do the same thing and if used correctly, will give the same result. The Watson, having no felt is easier to maintain, JMHO. Regarding the weather, the heat may not be a problem but I would wait myself if I could.
 

Flotsam

Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2002
Messages
3,221
Location
S.E. New Yor
I like th AP bulk loader. No felt and the gate opens automatically when you insert the the crank. Idiot-proof. Also, it keeps track of how much film you have left in the bulk roll and does accurate frame counts in the cassette. Great if you want to load 35 frame rolls so that they can be cut into 5 frame strips without having that one leftover frame.
 

Jim Jones

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
3,740
Location
Chillicothe MO
Format
Multi Format
I wouldn't worry about August heat for B&W film. I've respooled hundreds of rolls with a Watson 100 and the similar Alden 74 with few problems. An older felt-trap Watson did scratch film. Perhaps one can keep the felt trap clean enough, but why gamble?
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom