CHS ISO 10 if possible.
I do miss my Panatomic-X, so I said 32.
Why does Adox only produce one traditional B&W film (CHS 100 II)? The rest need some sort of speciality developer for it to work.
Adox/EFKE 25 had an ISO of 25 in Tungsten light, the Daylight speed was roughly double, a datasheet from the 70's said 40ASA in one developer and higher with another EFKE developer (similar to Microphen). At one time films carried Daylight and Tungsten ASA later ISO speeds..
You need to try the new Adox CHS II 100 first
JPD - you're pretty much describing the behaviour of CHS II. It is a drastically better film than the EFKE material in all regards - as much as I liked the old CHS.
The reality is that the best 25 ISO film APX25 had to be discontinued after a key ingredient (chemical compind) stopped being produced, often this is for non photographic uses as happened with the developong agent used in Promicrol and Agfa A49. Or the chemical was banned by the EU.
The quality that's available if you make an effort to fine tune your work flow with judicious choice of film and developer, and also most importantly tight process control including minimal temperaure is quite surprising. It's also the key to superb results.
+1I'd love to see a super-slow emulsion in sheet film sizes so I can use some of my barrel lenses with hand-operated shutters (lens cap, dark slide, etc). I'd vote for the 25 speed also.
I'd love to see a super-slow emulsion in sheet film sizes so I can use some of my barrel lenses with hand-operated shutters (lens cap, dark slide, etc). I'd vote for the 25 speed also.
Isn´t Rollei RPX 25 available as sheet film?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?