Waist Level Finders, do you get used to them?

Matthew

A
Matthew

  • 1
  • 1
  • 175
Sonatas XII-54 (Life)

A
Sonatas XII-54 (Life)

  • 2
  • 3
  • 210
Zakynthos Town

H
Zakynthos Town

  • 0
  • 1
  • 1K
Driftwood

A
Driftwood

  • 12
  • 2
  • 1K
Trees

D
Trees

  • 4
  • 3
  • 2K

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,787
Messages
2,796,717
Members
100,034
Latest member
Thelongdark
Recent bookmarks
0

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,646
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I'm comfortable using them. I've been using them, off and on, for decades.
For scenes that have a bit of movement in them, it just takes a conscious effort to follow what I need to follow.
I've never tried to use them for most sports or anything else with a lot of movement.
They probably would be fine for golf!
 

narsuitus

Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2004
Messages
1,813
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
did you acclimate to the mirror image, if so how quickly?

Decades ago, I only used waist-level view finders.

My first eye-level SLR (Miranda Sensorex) had a removable prism that could be replaced with a waist-level finder.

I took me a while to acclimate to the eye-level view finder.
 

David T T

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2012
Messages
187
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Multi Format
I still have difficulties framing/composing photos with the RB67 at times, after years of using it for the vast majority of what I do. Or perhaps delays would be a better term. Still my favorite viewfinder by far!
 

Arklatexian

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2014
Messages
1,777
Location
Shreveport,
Format
Multi Format
did you acclimate to the mirror image, if so how quickly?

Did you ever find yourself driving home from a shoot, veering into traffic?

(Ok, the last question isn’t really serious.)
I am left handed. Everything has been backwards all my life. I guess that is why I have had little if any problems with what you describe. Upside-down 4x5 ground glass images are somewhat different, however........Regards!
 

TheRook

Member
Joined
May 18, 2016
Messages
413
Location
Philadelphia
Format
35mm
Yes, I got used to it after about of week or so by simply practicing half an hour a day. You don't really need to actually take pictures to practice using a waist level viewfinder. Only after I developed the skills to frame the shot and adjust focus very quickly did I feel ready to start on my first roll of film.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,490
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
did you acclimate to the mirror image, if so how quickly?

Did you ever find yourself driving home from a shoot, veering into traffic?

(Ok, the last question isn’t really serious.)


I never acclimated. I tried it for years. Never liked it. In fact it drove me to shoot 35mm slr until I bought the Hasselblad. I have the WLF I bought with my Hasselblad and it has remained folded up and stored ever since I bought it. The PME is way to go.
 
Last edited:

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,702
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
did you acclimate to the mirror image, if so how quickly?

Did you ever find yourself driving home from a shoot, veering into traffic?

(Ok, the last question isn’t really serious.)
Yeah, you'll get used to them quickly;takes a few rolls; a lot lighter than the other finders too.
 

Ai Print

Subscriber
Joined
May 28, 2015
Messages
1,292
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format
I suppose it varies from person to person but it does not take long for me to get into the reversed groove of a WL finder.
 

summicron1

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
2,920
Location
Ogden, Utah
Format
Multi Format
I suspect it is a personal thing, but the human eye/mind is an amazing thing.

When I first got progressive lenses instead of bifocals I was told that I'd spend about two weeks bumping into things and falling down stairs but then one day I'd put them on and everything would be right and normal and I'd never give it a thought.

And so it was.

I read of an experiment, years ago, where scientist types demonstrated this adaptability by having volunteers wear special glasses that inverted the world -- made everything they looked at upside down. Again, they spent a cupla weeks falling down stairs and so on, but then their minds figure out what was going on and suddenly the whole world looked right.

Until they took the glasses off, of course. Then it was upside down again.
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
6,297
Format
Multi Format
I shot my Mamiya RZ for many years with a waist level finder because prism finders were unaffordable. I finally found a used one on Ebay and it opened up a whole new world of composing with my RZ. I don't think or see "flopped".
 

Stephen Prunier

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 13, 2008
Messages
372
Location
North Shore, MA,
Format
Multi Format
I had an RZ that came with the waist level finder. I added the prism finder and I was really happy. My exposures improved a lot. Well I sold that set up a year ago to pay for a Nikon D model. I had the RZ for 3 years and made money on it. But I missed the RZ and I purchased another set up this past spring. This time I got the RZ II with WLF. It takes some getting use too, but it's not a deal breaker. I think the more you do it the more comfortable you'll become with it.
 

Arthurwg

Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
2,757
Location
Taos NM
Format
Medium Format
Always use a prism on my Hasselblad. It also has a very good light meter which helps. But I'm sure I could get used to the WLF if I had to.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,490
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Always use a prism on my Hasselblad. It also has a very good light meter which helps. But I'm sure I could get used to the WLF if I had to.

I could but really did not like it. Having a prism improved my composing and photographs.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
15,011
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
I tend to use 45 degree prism on Hasselblad and Bronica SQ-AI. Always, Always ,use WLF on RZ67 II. I know this sounds nuts, but WLF is easier (for me ) with a rectangle instead of a square focusing screen.
 

Slixtiesix

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 31, 2006
Messages
1,408
Format
Medium Format
Always liked it from the very first moment I tried it. I prefer it over prisms. The WLF was one of the reasons why I went MF.
 

GLS

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2018
Messages
1,727
Location
England
Format
Multi Format
Never liked using it very much on my Hasselblad. Ever since I got my PM45 the WLF has been sat in a cupboard.
 

Old_Dick

Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2014
Messages
396
Location
03082
Format
Multi Format
Not a problem for me.
 
OP
OP

abruzzi

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2018
Messages
3,113
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
Large Format
95% of my shots are static subjects so right now, its not hard,but I'm kind of like a ball in a pinball machine--bouncing back and forth, overshooting, until I zero in on where I need to be. Composing moving subjects is tough for me.

I will say I like everything else about the WLF, especially the feeling of looking-at my image, instead of looking through a periscope to the object on the other side.
 
OP
OP

abruzzi

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2018
Messages
3,113
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
Large Format
I tend to use 45 degree prism on Hasselblad and Bronica SQ-AI. Always, Always ,use WLF on RZ67 II. I know this sounds nuts, but WLF is easier (for me ) with a rectangle instead of a square focusing screen.

Does the RZ67 actually mask the image to align with the back? I've never used one, but I kind of expected it just displayed a 7x7 square with crop lines. Is the RB67 the same?
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,646
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Does the RZ67 actually mask the image to align with the back? I've never used one, but I kind of expected it just displayed a 7x7 square with crop lines. Is the RB67 the same?
With the RB67 Pro S there are cropping guides that change their appearance when you rotate the back.
I expect the same applies for the Pro-Sd and the RZ67 models.
 

choiliefan

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
1,337
Format
Medium Format
My mom gifted me a Mamiya C33 when I was in HS in the early 70's so got used to the WLF early in life.
Still prefer it (or a magnifying chimney finder) to a prism mainly because of the lighter weight and brighter viewing.
 

dynachrome

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Messages
1,791
Format
35mm
A WL finder is handy for certain close-up work. When do I mostly use it? When I carry a Bronica SQ-A with one lens (80 or 65)and a 120 back. It's reasonably light, more versatile than a TLR and still gives me a nice 6X6 image. As someone else mentioned, with an RB camera the chimney finder is brighter and lighter. I do, however, sometimes use an RB hand held with a WL finder.
 

Luckless

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Messages
1,365
Location
Canada
Format
Multi Format
I sometimes find myself caught out slightly when switching between my regular Pentaprism SLR and waist level finder on my TLR, especially when carrying them both to photograph sports. What seems to especially get me is adjusting level on the TLR, as I'm prone to both rotating the wrong way, and then promptly over-correcting my error, because why wouldn't I make things harder on myself in such cases?

However for the most part I don't find it to be that bothersome, and consider myself lucky to be able to quickly switch between my SLR, TLR, and large format view camera. I find the key is to slow down and make small slow adjustments to start with till my brain clicks over to the different view space before trying to move quickly.

And when tracking with the TLR's waist level finder I tend to try and visualize where I am in the space as much as I am looking through the viewfinder - Kind of picturing it as if I'm looking down on myself from behind, and rotating from the waist to roughly point the camera in the direction of what's going on. I'm sure the volume of video games I've played over the years has warped my mind's ability to process spaces in interesting ways.
 

NJH

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2013
Messages
702
Location
Dorset
Format
Multi Format
It is properly freaky when you do suddenly get used to the left right flip. In my case I really struggled at first and actually gave up on WLF for a while. Then I was practising one day and kept telling myself no move the camera in the other direction. Then it happened. I have no problem at all with following movement or composing with the WLF now, if you tell your brain long and hard enough to rewire it does eventually do as instructed.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,490
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
When I used a WLF on the field taking sports photographs, no matter how many months or years I used it, I missed a lot of shots going the wrong way. That is never a problem with the prism.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom