Visiting Colour Landscapes after specialising in B&W portraiture

Not Texas

H
Not Texas

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Floating

D
Floating

  • 1
  • 0
  • 11
Cradle

D
Cradle

  • 0
  • 0
  • 38

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,522
Messages
2,776,551
Members
99,638
Latest member
Jux9pr
Recent bookmarks
0
OP
OP
Nicole

Nicole

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
2,562
Location
Perth, Western Australia
Format
Multi Format
Thanks for all the input and suggestions! I'll be shooting some rolls you mentioned here this weekend to see which film I prefer.
Thanks again, kindest regards, Nicole
 

benjiboy

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
11,964
Location
U.K.
Format
35mm
Just a further thought Nicole, about slide films and film formats. I collected a couple of rolls of Velvia 100 120 yesterday, and a roll of the same film in 35mm, many of the shots were taken in the the same lighting at the same exposure for comparison, on projecting them I saw something I had known for years, the tonality, colour saturation and placticity of the image on roll film is far better than 35 mm, and as far as digital is concerned. forget it. I was seriously thinking last night of selling all my Canon gear and giving up 35 mm, try it sometime. I only have Mamiya TLR stuff, projected 6x6 slides with your Hassy should blow your sox off.

Best Wishes. Ben
 
OP
OP
Nicole

Nicole

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
2,562
Location
Perth, Western Australia
Format
Multi Format
Bentley I know can see what you mean. I've been shooting some colour slide film (on location portraits though and not landscapes) on my blad and it is pretty awesome! Only thing is I'd have to hire a 6x6 projector (haven't seen one for sale around here for the past 2 years or more) and hiring is not cheap. Also I can't get hold of any 6x6 slide holders here either. So I leave the slide film in sleeves and get the lab to print the chosen ones for me.
 

steve

Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2002
Messages
235
If you're really interested in color work, then you need to define for yourself why you want color. This will help you in choosing the film. Choosing a film type is like setting up your color palette if you're a painter.

Each film has its own special way of rendering color. As you've seen from the responses, each person has their own favorite films. Negative films give greater latitude while transparency films compress tonal ranges.

Certain films give specific colors added emphasis. For example, Portra leans towards greens and blues very slightly and has a very "fresh" clean looking color rendering. If you were to shoot E100G, you'd find a film that has more latitude than Provia and gives a "thicker" or "meatier" color rendering.

Kodak's UC color negative film is probably the best color neg film Kodak has ever produced for general outdoor photography. Both the 100 and 400 versions give punchy, long scale renderings.

However, it's not the film I'd use on a commercial architectural shoot where absolute accurate color was a requirement.

I hope this helps you understand my comment that you really need to define the "why in color" portion of what you're doing. If you can understand why you're shooting a subject in color, then choosing the right film will enhance the color rendering which reinforces the image itself.

Why film rather than digital?

My personal problem with digital cameras is that they make everything look the same. In color, you're really imaging the color temperature of the light itself. Each film has its own personality that responds to color temperature changes in a unique way giving the image a specific "look."

That's what's missing from digital color work outdoors. How in PS do you make a digital camera image look like it was taken with Provia using an 81A filter at a color temperature of 4137?

You can take a digital image, go into PS change the color temperature to 4137 and apply an 81A filter - but, it won't look like it was taken on Provia because there is NO WAY to duplicate the film's unique response - which includes some unequal color response because the film's spectral response in each layer.

Likewise, if you shot the same scene with E100G with an 81A filter it would look nothing like the Provia, and you couldn't make that difference in PS without first SEEING the difference as it was rendered on film.

It gets back to the color palette of the film and being able to use that palette under different types of light to show the light color qualities and NOT just an image in color.
 

stark raving

Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2005
Messages
126
Location
Lumberton, N
Format
35mm
Another vote for Kodak E100G. You may want to use a warming filter if the picture contains a lot of shadow area. In all other aspects, an excellent all-around film with a good neutral color balance. ......but, as you can see elsewhere in this thread, it's a really personal thing.
Jonathan
 

Jim_in_Kyiv

Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2005
Messages
231
Location
Ukraine
Format
Med. Format RF
And another for Kodak E100G. I just started on 4x5 slide and while it's all that's commonly sold over the counter in this neck of the woods, I've been happy with it. I never really shot enough 35 or 120 slide film to form an opinion.

As for the film-less camera thingy- I use mine all the time as a light meter. Works pretty well for that.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom