Very odd problem with Foma 400 bulk roll

[koraks]

It's not a coating or emulsion problem. You're wasting your time on that angle.

 

[pentaxuser]

. The emulsion number is 012616-17 expiration date is March 20027. I will email Foma to see if they have any insight.

I was going to say this looks like a sensible idea but it looks as if Foma will give you a blunt "no problem here" answer based on koraks' post

Still however unlikely that it is a coating problem at least the expected answer from Foma rules a Foma fault out

pentaxuser

 

[Sharktooth]

As a sanity check, what are the edge markings identifying the film type. I'm assuming Foma film will have edge markings that identify it as Foma 400.

I say this, because I have a few different bulk rolls of film, but only one loader. My usual practise is to put a bulk roll in the loader, and then wind a few cassettes. I'll label the contents of the loader with masking tape. If I need load another film type, I'll take the bulk roll currently in the loader, and transfer it back into it's original tin. Now I can put the different film type in the bulk loader and roll some cassettes. It's easy to forget to change the label on the bulk loader to show it has different film inside, especially if it's been a while since you last rolled some cassettes.

 

[Paul Howell]

I have the can, but I just noticed that it is Arista Edu, not Foma brand, I know that Foma makes Arista films, but it will provide Foma a reason to say not ours. But given that 400 can only with a few developers can Foma 400 shoot near 400, while Foma 200 can be shot at 200 with most developers and has better grain, with higher LPM at 110, while Foma 400 is 90 LPM then I will stop buying 400 and just go with 200. As I understand it 200 is a hybrid emlusion, mix of T and tradtional grain.

 

[F4U]

I have an Arista 400 roll of developed film in my hand. There are no edge markings. so that is no help But a 100 foot roll of film just can't change speeds like that, even if there's 15 years of differnce. Something else has to be wrong. Unless the factory coating machine ran out of emulsion mix before someone noticed and refilled it which I suppose is possible. This is a new one, for sure.

 

[Paul Howell]

It must have been something I did, just cannot figure out what I did wrong, not just once, but 3 times.

 

[Kino]

Does this Foma have the usual anti-halation dyes? Green, I believe...

If not, maybe a defective clear AHU layer?

 

[Nopo]

Foma in 35 mm does not dye the developer green. This happens on 120 mm film.


Carlos

 

[AnselMortensen]

Arista EDU is Foma

Arista EDU DX is purportedly Kentmere.

 

[Paul Howell]

I have used both Kentmere and Ultrafine extreme in the past, but switched back to Foma as Foma has the anti-halation layer. Here in the low desert the glare can be a problem. Good to know that Arista EDU DX is Kentmere, I just bought a few rolls to use my Konica and Pentax point and shoots.

 

[koraks]

I'm assuming Foma film will have edge markings that identify it as Foma 400.

Bulk Foma has no markings.

Does this Foma have the usual anti-halation dyes? Green, I believe...

Only in 120 and sheet film. The 35mm product relies on anti-halation properties of the base.
And no, anti-halation being 'defective' doesn't explain a magic 3 stop speed loss. The anti-halation on Foma's 35mm products is moderately effective at best, btw.

switched back to Foma as Foma has the anti-halation layer. Here in the low desert the glare can be a problem.

Then Foma films are not your best bet in 35mm, to be honest. You're better off with something like HP5+.