I've never shot slide film, ever, but I've come to realize that people that take color film photography seriously don't seem to shoot print film.
Plus, I really want to shoot some slides just because I've never even SEEN developed slide film. I'm a materials scientist working with mostly electronic materials. I see a lot of really creative technology every day, but the idea that humans developed film that could create a positive image with color fidelity just blows me away. Color print film not so much, because there's so much room for fudging in the printing process. But slide film, wow. It's almost like I don't believe it.
I don't want any of that color negative film anymore.
I told myself that I would at least give the new Ektar 100 a try. But I find that I just avoid the body I loaded it into like the plague.
It's all preferential, I know, but what's less clear is whether it's a no-no to deride colour negative film as a novelty. I feel like I raise the hackles of many by saying so.
Hey, you won't raise my hacklesI feel like I raise the hackles of SO many when I voice the fact that I feel that color negative film has little to nothing to offer over digital - especially here on apug.org. For me, color transparencies and B+W are THE reasons to still shoot film.
I feel like I raise the hackles of SO many when I voice the fact that I feel that color negative film has little to nothing to offer over digital - especially here on apug.org. For me, color transparencies and B+W are THE reasons to still shoot film.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?