So right now Fuji does not have any color negative film in 120 or in sheets, just two color slide films (Provia and Velvia 100) and one B/W film (Acros). All ISO 100... Wonderful!
The purest rarified BS.But Velvia 100 has chemicals that have been outlawed by US regulators.
Although regulations might be silly regarding Velvia 100, it's going to get hard to buy and process in a lab unless Fuji changes the chemical makeup.The purest ratified BS.
Love Fuji and their film. Everybody should buy some right now. Provia is probably the greatest colour film ever.
But the excuse with regulations is horse shit.
Provia is probably the greatest colour film ever.
Just hope fuji hunt keeps producing e-6 chems
How can I never have heard of Fuji Pro 160 NS?
Seems like a wonderful film? Reviews are scarce.
How does/did it stack up to Ektar/Portra 160?
How can I never have heard of Fuji Pro 160 NS?
Seems like a wonderful film? Reviews are scarce.
How does/did it stack up to Ektar/Portra 160?
How can I never have heard of Fuji Pro 160 NS?
Seems like a wonderful film? Reviews are scarce.
How does/did it stack up to Ektar/Portra 160?
But Velvia 100 has chemicals that have been outlawed by US regulators.
May the ghost of Kodachrome haunt you forever!
Anyway, I have not been able to find fresh stock of 35mm E6 anywhere for under $20 US.
But I neither use it or Portra 160 in 120 anymore, because with Provia 100F I get much better results at much lower costs:
Provia 100F provides:
...
- much lower overall costs, as the film itself is significantly cheaper, and no expensive or time consuming scans are needed with Provia compared to 160NS, Portra etc.
Don't ask us. Because we have been talking about this film for years here on photrio.
- all the above also when exposed at EI 200/24° with push 1 processing (Provia is brillant at that speed, too, and also pulled at EI 50/18° or 64/19°)
As a former Kodachrome user I don't miss it at all. Because Provia 100F, the Velvias, Astia 100F, Sensia, E100G, E100 etc. all have surpassed Kodachrome 64 in all aspects.
While I don't disagree that Provia is a fantastic film... I mean, I LOVE Provia SO much. You're missing a couple of things and reaching for a couple more.
As for costs, the slide film costs more -- especially in 135, where it's $5 a roll more expensive,
but even in 120 where my last box cost me $50ish and Portra 160 cost me $44.
The developing costs more,
and I still have to scan because I have no way of projecting 6x8 slides, nor will anyone ever see them. Kind of a shame as they are pretty incredible in a way that the computer doesn't quite replicate. I like just looking at the slide itself, which is weird, but it's not like I can get others to do so. Thankfully it scans very easily, and I have gotten some great lab prints from Velvia and Provia shots. But that's just the way it is. For me, the price is 5%-15% more for slides, even including time.
Likewise, when shooting, the negative films have significantly more dynamic range.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?