darkosaric
Member
If paper will be bad in normal developer - you can still use it in Lith print process.
Kodak chemicals have a better chance at being good than chemicals from other manufacturers.
In Ontario, Canada (where the OP is) it probably is true that these Kodak chemicals have a better chance at being usable, but not because they are inherently better.So, you are saying that Ilford, Adox, Foma, Fuji, Rollei and all the other small manufacturers are not good?
Have you ever used chemicals from any of these for a long time so you could have made that comparison?

No, but I am a husbandHi Matt,
Are you a diplomat?
If I were you, I would look at a career in Diplomacy.
You certainly have a good grasp of it.
BTW, are you sure that Kodak chemicals are still made in the USA? Or is it in some factory in Asia and so a lot further afield than say Mobberley?
.
I've never seen one before that doesn't have either Ilford Imaging or Harman on the back.
Start a Conversation with the Harman/Ilford reps on APUG - Harman Tech Service - attach the two photos and ask them how old it might be.
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |
