- Joined
- Feb 9, 2010
- Messages
- 9,312
- Format
- 4x5 Format
Was this confirmed or found to be a mistake? If it was a mistake what was the DOF found to be?
Was this confirmed or found to be a mistake? If it was a mistake what was the DOF found to be?DOF at the subject (paper) is a mere 0.016mm in front of the subject and 0.017 behind the subject.
Bill, the unit should have been 0.016 'meter', but I erroneously stated it as millimeters.Was this confirmed or found to be a mistake? If it was a mistake what was the DOF found to be?
Bill, the unit should have been 0.016 'meter', but I erroneously stated it as millimeters.
With correct units, it would be 16mm to one direction from plane of focus.
Depends what you mean by multi page.I made two claims in my video:
1- That the internet (ie, Photrio) makes this into a multi page argument
2- using paper doesn’t make a difference
Whether you agree with claim 2 or not, claim 1 has been proven true.
Just close your eyes during the introI started watching this video and lost the will to live.
@MattKing is not saying anyone needs to stop using paper under a grain focuser.
There is a difference between saying there is no demonstrable reason to do something and saying that you should stop doing it.
Anyone here can demonstrate to him or herself whether or not paper/no-paper makes any difference.
I started watching this video and lost the will to live.
I made two claims in my video:
1- That the internet (ie, Photrio) makes this into a multi page argument
2- using paper doesn’t make a difference
Don’t take it personally. I would find it excruciating to listen to myself for 15 minutes. The problem with YouTube is that it takes about ten times longer to say something than it does to read the same information on the printed page, so I just don’t have the patience for it.Thank you both for you rude comments about me as though I’m not right here. Very classy.
It's what you get out of 'em that the authors (or drug compnies) care about.Youtube is for people to get subscribers, get views, make money. The more time passes, the less there is that isn't already beaten to death a hundred times. Most videos are about as informative as a laxative commercial.
It's what you get out of them that the authors care about.
If you come back to view another YouTube posting, they win. If not, no skin off their back.That is, ... well, ... naive.
You do realize how absurd this statement is, don't you?
Heck, if you don't want to put a piece of paper in your easel to focus on, just glue a small piece onto the bottom of your grain focuser and be done with it forever; and be as precise as you possibly can be.
Doremus
good man because, that actually makes a difference.I guess I am relieved that people are actually using grain focusers instead of just eyeballing it. If you’ve gone to all the trouble of using a grain focuser, why not go whole hog by placing a piece of enlarging paper under it? As long as you are thinking about trying to make your images sharp, you also might want to align your negative carrier and baseboard. For extra credit, you could place a piece of heat absorbing glass between your light source and negative carrier so your negatives don’t buckle. I am sort of picky and use a glass negative carrier.
I think I’ll cover a less controversial topic like “should you pre wet your film or not”.
I like yr videos. Well presented and informative.Thank you both for you rude comments about me as though I’m not right here. Very classy.
I think I’ll cover a less controversial topic like “should you pre wet your film or not”.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?