Used Nikkor enlarger lens sold for $3000 on e-Bay
-
A
- Thread starter gr82bart
- Start date
Recent Classifieds
-
For Sale For Sale: 35mm ƒ/2.8 Olympus OM Shift Lens - Clean, complete. $200
- Started by Kodachromeguy
-
Want to Buy WTB: Pentax LX for parts, or.
- Started by dirkfletcher
-
For Sale FS: Voigtlander Helomar 240mm f/3.5 Lens
- Started by B.S.Kumar
-
For Sale Kodak TMax 400, expired, 35mm x 150 ft rolls
- Started by MCB18
-
For Sale FS: TTH Cooke Series V 12x10 Lens Eq. Focus 16.3 inch
- Started by B.S.Kumar
Forum statistics
Holy Moly....
Guess I'll stick with my cheapo Schneider-Kreuznach lenses.
Jo
Guess I'll stick with my cheapo Schneider-Kreuznach lenses.
Jo
I'll have to remember this in case I ever find one of those lenses at a yard sale or the photo flea market in nearby huntsville 
Supposedly the Apo Nikkor is the one of the rarest and best enlarging lenses ever made, so I can understand why it went for the price it did—not that I'd ever pay that much for one.
David A. Goldfarb
Moderator
It's an Apo El-Nikkor. That's what they cost.
Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry9000/4.6.0.167 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/102 UP.Link/6.3.0.0.0)
Whose lens was it and was it signed?
Whose lens was it and was it signed?
Is that lens made of solid gold/ Does it use rare earth elements? does it set up and make perfect prints on its own? I dont think I have 10% of that in my entire darkroom, and I have three enlargers and five Schneider lenses!!!! I guess i should be selling not buying ---- SHEESH
I wonder how much of the $40+ in shipping is for insurance...
Why it's special is mentioned in the thread about Ctein's test of enlarging lenses. The APO 105 is not your garden variety enlarger lens.
Even when your garden grows Schneiders and Rodenstocks.
Whether it's worth it in practical terms is a whole different argument. It wouldn't be to me, but that's obviously not the case for some ebay buyer.
Even when your garden grows Schneiders and Rodenstocks.
Whether it's worth it in practical terms is a whole different argument. It wouldn't be to me, but that's obviously not the case for some ebay buyer.
It must be one hell of a lens. No way I can afford it!
Jeff
Jeff
hmm I think I have one shoved in a junk drawer somewhere..
No really I do have one (its not in my junk drawer though)
I could sure use some $ for some other gear, do you think if I put my 105mm APO EL NIkkor on ebay it would go for anything close to that?
I could sure use some $ for some other gear, do you think if I put my 105mm APO EL NIkkor on ebay it would go for anything close to that?
I love it! The defence rests. No more questions Your Honour. Canon et al, eat your hearts out! Makes me feel warm and fuzzy about my el-nikkors (not quite the APO's though). Cheers Michael.
Cheers Michael.
I'd love to know if it'd be possible ..... perhaps using scientific testing - to determine where this lens excels in image quality over another prime quality 6 element enlarging lens ?
I have an almost new Scnieder 150mm APO which i bought on fleabay for a giveaway price a while ago. Have never used it though as I need a differrent lens mount for the Devere. Be interesting to do some tests.
I have an almost new Scnieder 150mm APO which i bought on fleabay for a giveaway price a while ago. Have never used it though as I need a differrent lens mount for the Devere. Be interesting to do some tests.
Acording to a thread here, I can not find it, the new price was $ 7000,- and extremly rare so this price is actualy prety good.
It seems to be designed for NASA and is color fully corrected. Nikon stoped making them about 5 years ago.
Peter
It seems to be designed for NASA and is color fully corrected. Nikon stoped making them about 5 years ago.
Peter
OK let's try for my rare 2,8/80mm Meogon lens from Meopta produced in Prerov (Special KGB product).
For 3000,- I am selling it. Completly color corrected and an aperture of 2,8 where even Rodenstock or Schneider-Kreutznach doesn't have an equivalent.
For 3000,- I am selling it. Completly color corrected and an aperture of 2,8 where even Rodenstock or Schneider-Kreutznach doesn't have an equivalent.
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2002
- Messages
- 48
A few years ago I bought it for KCz 850,- including the label: KGB approved by Зинченко exchange strickly forbidden. :rolleyes:
Once upon a time...
While walking down Mass. Ave. in Cambridge I was accosted by an enterprising type, who, so stereotypically it was nearly hilarious, opened his great coat to display a number of wristwatches (? ..or ?) pinned to its lining.
Accoster: Man, I'm selling these watches.
Me: Oh yeah? To who?
A: To you.
M: No. Won't happen.
I have to wonder ... Not that I would have the slightest doubt about the absolute integrity of each and every transaction on "The bay" ... but...
While walking down Mass. Ave. in Cambridge I was accosted by an enterprising type, who, so stereotypically it was nearly hilarious, opened his great coat to display a number of wristwatches (? ..or ?) pinned to its lining.
Accoster: Man, I'm selling these watches.
Me: Oh yeah? To who?
A: To you.
M: No. Won't happen.
I have to wonder ... Not that I would have the slightest doubt about the absolute integrity of each and every transaction on "The bay" ... but...
Before I would wish for such a lens, I would first wish for the ability to discern the difference in print quality between it and the lens I now use. 
Michel Hardy-Vallée
Membership Council
As David said above, the price for that lens is right. Obviously, in one's kitchen makeshift darkroom setup, where the enlarger head is not always aligned, and where prints do not go beyond 8x10 in B&W, the real payoff would be negligible.
But if you were to print colour, to make giant enlargements, dye transfer matrices, colour separations for an art magazine, and so on, then the payoff in precision would probably reveal itself.
In his test (published in Post Exposure), Ctein measured that the corner falloff at optimal aperture was 0.1 stop, and visible distortion was 0%. This was the only lens with no measurable flare, and no detectable aberrations of any type, nor decentering.
So in other words, it means that this is a lens for which QC is outstanding. A professional lab, a pre-press shop, or something similar would have seen it as an investment to avoid any potential trouble further down the line.
Even considering those factors, Ctein says that he did not need it to make excellent colour separations for dye transfer! So I guess very few people really need the ultimate in quality.
BTW, 3k$ is the price of a new Summicron ASPH. I suppose if you're willing to spend that kind of money on the lens you use for your negatives, then you should spend proportionally on the lens you use to print these precious shots...
But if you were to print colour, to make giant enlargements, dye transfer matrices, colour separations for an art magazine, and so on, then the payoff in precision would probably reveal itself.
In his test (published in Post Exposure), Ctein measured that the corner falloff at optimal aperture was 0.1 stop, and visible distortion was 0%. This was the only lens with no measurable flare, and no detectable aberrations of any type, nor decentering.
So in other words, it means that this is a lens for which QC is outstanding. A professional lab, a pre-press shop, or something similar would have seen it as an investment to avoid any potential trouble further down the line.
Even considering those factors, Ctein says that he did not need it to make excellent colour separations for dye transfer! So I guess very few people really need the ultimate in quality.
BTW, 3k$ is the price of a new Summicron ASPH. I suppose if you're willing to spend that kind of money on the lens you use for your negatives, then you should spend proportionally on the lens you use to print these precious shots...
Why on earth would flare be an issue for an enlarging lens?
The lens is also certified 100% dinosaur proof. Just because it's unlikely doesn't mean it couldn't happen...
Joking aside, wow. Nice to see there's still this sort of appreciation out there for a top of the line lens. Very informative thread too.
Ctein even says he isn't quite sure why this lens is needed (he doesn't use any true APO lens (which this APO El Nikkor is) for his critical work. And while he describes it as one of the most perfect enlarging lenses made with no abberations, and 'true APO' without longitudinal chromatic abberations (like other APO lenses) yet it suffers from greater diffraction (due to its maximum f/5.6) than other enlarging lenses that have f/4.
Michel Hardy-Vallée
Membership Council
Flare = lessening of contrast in projected image = crap.
Flare-causing light in this situation is BEHIND the lens, not before.
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:  |