Unreasonable for Nikkor 28-85 AIS to vignette?

Tomato

A
Tomato

  • 2
  • 0
  • 19
Cool

A
Cool

  • 3
  • 0
  • 34
Coquitlam River BC

D
Coquitlam River BC

  • 4
  • 0
  • 39
Mayday celebrations

A
Mayday celebrations

  • 2
  • 2
  • 84
MayDay celebration

A
MayDay celebration

  • 2
  • 0
  • 84

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,564
Messages
2,761,110
Members
99,404
Latest member
ManfrediFilm
Recent bookmarks
0

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
Using a Nikkor 28-85 AIS with L37c filter and recommended HK-16 hood, I get severe vignetting at 28mm. By 35mm it's gone. I'm presuming it's because of the filter placing the hood further out. Doesn't it seem unreasonable that adding the recommended hood and a very commonly used (Nikon) filter makes the wider focal lengths unusable?

I can get by without that filter, but I can envision scenarios where a person would want both some type of filter and the hood for their work.

IMAG4675.jpg
 

NedL

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
3,369
Location
Sonoma County, California
Format
Multi Format
I don't know the answer for that particular lens + hood, but I have a hood for my 50mm AI that will catch the corners of the frame if I use a filter in front of it. Fortunately this lens hood has filter threads on both sides, so the filter can be placed "inside" the hood, also making the lens cap easier to put on and off.

I don't have any idea if that's an option with the HK-16... just a thought.
 

benjiboy

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
11,948
Location
U.K.
Format
35mm
Canon lens hoods bayonet fit on the outside of the lenses for this exact reason.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,155
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
The filter and the hood must be for the wide angle lens
 
OP
OP
Theo Sulphate

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
Canon lens hoods bayonet fit on the outside of the lenses for this exact reason.

This hood fits on the outside as well: it's a slip-on hood with a tightening screw ... not a design I'm fond of.

The filter and the hood must be for the wide angle lens

The HK-16 hood was what Nikon listed specifically for this lens (the 28-85 f/3.5-4.5 AIS). It may be the *only* lens this hood was designed for, since I've not found any other lens which uses that hood.

http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/companies/nikon/nikkoresources/zoomsMF/2885mm.htm

Perhaps there are thinner filters that could be substituted. I think Nikon actually screwed up here.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
2,408
Location
London, UK
Format
35mm
They really don't do anything but "look professional".
The purpose of a lens hood is dual: shade the lens and prevent a larger damage if you drop the lens.
If you drop a lens, they tend to land on the hood. In that case the hood will be either bent (metal hood), broken (plastic) or just cushion the fall (rubber). But, the lens will survive.
Most of my hoods are rubber.
 

Jesper

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 29, 2009
Messages
874
Location
Sweden
Format
Multi Format
If you don't find a wide angle filter you can use a step up ring and use wider standard filter.
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,485
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
Some of the newer Nikkors lenses I have use a bayonet connection around the lens to hold the hood. That solves the problem. For example the HB-64 hood on my 28/1.8 attaches in that manner.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom