Underpowered UV exposure box?

Sciuridae

A
Sciuridae

  • 1
  • 0
  • 9
Takatoriyama

D
Takatoriyama

  • 4
  • 1
  • 73
Tree and reflection

H
Tree and reflection

  • 2
  • 0
  • 64
CK341

A
CK341

  • 3
  • 0
  • 70
Plum, Sun, Shade.jpeg

A
Plum, Sun, Shade.jpeg

  • sly
  • May 8, 2025
  • 3
  • 0
  • 105

Forum statistics

Threads
197,626
Messages
2,762,108
Members
99,424
Latest member
photopoetic
Recent bookmarks
0

Ecoleica

Member
Joined
May 22, 2008
Messages
10
Location
Dunedin
Format
35mm
Hi all, I am fairly new to alternative printing and I have been wanting to get consistent results with my cyanotypes (soon to be salt prints). So i contacted a local screen printing company that makes their own uv exposure boxes and purchased one of their units. I have done a bit of experimenting with it and it seems woefully underpowered for digital negatives (one step print took around 2 hours to expose!). I have attached a photo of the box. Currently there are 6x T5 8W tubes. Now I can always add more T5 Tubes to the unit or I could start from scratch and build something bigger and more powerful myself. What are your thoughts?

IMG_3566.jpg
 

pschwart

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 15, 2005
Messages
1,143
Location
San Francisco, CA
Format
Multi Format
You can do a lot better than that box.

Build your own with at least 8 T8 BL bulbs.
Use electronic ballasts.
The bulbs are way too far apart in the unit you purchased.
Install a fan to keep the bulbs cool.
I think a pizza oven design (with a door) is safer and provides better cooling
18" BL bulbs can be had for about $4 each and they last for years.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Doyle Thomas

Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Messages
276
Location
VANCOUVER, W
Format
8x10 Format
could be your chemistry too
 
OP
OP
Ecoleica

Ecoleica

Member
Joined
May 22, 2008
Messages
10
Location
Dunedin
Format
35mm
No issue with the chemistry that i know...I get good results when using the sun as a UV source
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
6,297
Format
Multi Format
Your box looks awfully deep. Maybe if you got the tubes closer to your print, it will speed things up. By lowering your tubes, you're taking advantage of Inverse Square Law.
re
 

ced

Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Messages
865
Location
Belgica
Format
Multi Format
Are they wired correctly (may be reducing the output) are they all coming on as there are switches on each tube?
I would put more tubes, some kind of reflectors (hammered chrome/alu sheets or foil and get the lamps closer to your contact frame.
 

Dahod

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2015
Messages
45
Location
Alberta, Canada
Format
Multi Format
As ced mentioned, you might want to check the wiring. From the picture it appears they're wired in series but every other unit I've seen and the one I built was wired in parallel See this article here ( http://web.physics.ucsb.edu/~lecturedemonstrations/Composer/Pages/64.36.html ) regarding wiring and bulb brightness.

I'm assuming they put in the correct UV bulbs for you so adding more would be a good thing. There's a lot of space between those T8 bulbs.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,025
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Does anyone know whether the back panel might play a role?
With respect to visible light, a white background helps to reflect light forward. Is there a background that reflects UV?
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
6,297
Format
Multi Format
One question none of us asked what kind of tubes are they. I use actinic tubes made for aquariums and my exposure times are 7 mins.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom