• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

underdeveloped neopan 1600@800 D76 1+1

twisted wheels

A
twisted wheels

  • 0
  • 0
  • 11
Chose vue

A
Chose vue

  • 0
  • 1
  • 23

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
202,073
Messages
2,834,619
Members
101,099
Latest member
pavloskatsonis
Recent bookmarks
0

bowie

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 4, 2007
Messages
33
Format
35mm Pan
Hello,
I have developed neopan 1600 exposed as 800 in D-76 1+1, 20degrees, 7min (including pouring in and out), agitation first 60sec, and then each 5sec in every 1min. The result: thin negative. What's wrong? The chemistry was fresh, I have also develped TXP 320 D-76 1+1, and it came out perfect as usuall.
Do you think I should use intensifier to improve underdeveloped neopan? It has been exposed correctly
thanks in advance for help
 

mrred

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
1,251
Location
Montreal, Ca
Format
Multi Format
How fresh was the film? The faster the film the faster it ages and gets slower.

I noticed that is the exact time of the MDC. If that is where you got it, you should be treating it as a starting point and adjust accordingly.
 
OP
OP

bowie

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 4, 2007
Messages
33
Format
35mm Pan
Fresh stuff, expiration date June 2012, kept it in the refrigerator

BWT, any recomendations for neopan 1600@800 in rodinal?
 

JMcLaug351

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 25, 2003
Messages
79
Might be a long shot but how long a time was it from out of the refrigerator till exposure? Just thinking out loud.
JOHN
 

mrred

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
1,251
Location
Montreal, Ca
Format
Multi Format
Most of my Neopan work was with Neopan 400, which I had great success pushing to 3200. I mostly used XTol, at that.

I would guess adding an extra minute to your D76 1:1 should give you the density you need.

I would not have a clue with rodinal outside of what MDC suggests.

You might want to give flickr a search, as people tend to post their developer times. It would ball-park you should expect.
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,748
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
First step, of course, is to determine if the negatives are under-exposed, under-developed or both.
Since you probably did not expose a step wedge on a portion of the film, you have a challenging task. One trick is to look at the film leader and check the D-max. You can also try to print them and see how easy they print, maybe they are really Ok.

The way to tell for sure:
1) expose a portion of the film to a step wedge. If the slope is less then about 0.65, then you have under-development.
2) expose a frame to a zone 1 scene. If the density of that frame is less than 0.1 log-d, then you are under-exposing.
 
OP
OP

bowie

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 4, 2007
Messages
33
Format
35mm Pan
Might be a long shot but how long a time was it from out of the refrigerator till exposure?

at least one night


I would guess adding an extra minute to your D76 1:1 should give you the density you need

In the Neopan 1600 data sheets one can find as follows:
1600@1600 -> D76 1+1 -> 9 min
1600@800 -> D76 1+1 -> 7 min

I have just tried Neopan 1600@800 developed 8min + time for pouring in and out. The negative looks excellent!! Seven minuts is too short
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom