TXP320 Reciprocity

Orlovka river valley

A
Orlovka river valley

  • 0
  • 0
  • 50
Norfolk coast - 2

A
Norfolk coast - 2

  • 3
  • 1
  • 54
In the Vondelpark

A
In the Vondelpark

  • 4
  • 2
  • 128
Cascade

A
Cascade

  • sly
  • May 22, 2025
  • 6
  • 6
  • 110
submini house

A
submini house

  • 0
  • 0
  • 79

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,832
Messages
2,765,204
Members
99,485
Latest member
zwh166288
Recent bookmarks
1

Sjixxxy

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2004
Messages
433
Location
Zenith City,
Format
8x10 Format
Anyone have a good formula for figureing out long exposure on TXP320 (4x5) I got some really heavy ND filters, and want to use them to simulate effects seen due to the multi-minute exposures of night photography, in open sun.

How different does the 320 vary from the 400 anyways? Think I could get away with using the 400TX number from the (there was a url link here which no longer exists) without disastrous results?
 

gainer

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 20, 2002
Messages
3,699
IIRC, the old versions of TRI-X 400 and 320 had the same correction according to Kodak. They were both much greater than any corrections Howard Bond found for most recent films. The old film would have had a coefficient of 1, so the time to be added would simply be Tm^1.62, where Tm is the measured or otherwise estimated time if there were reciprocal trade agreement. I think that would be a conservative estimate. Anyway, overexposure is hard to come by in dim light. If the first coefficient were only 0.5, you would be off by one stop using 1.0.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom