I haven't forgotten!
P.S. Jay, I haven't forgotten that I owe you some prints! They are sitting on my table right now, waiting for me to spot them. Thank you for your generosity and patience.
P.S. Jay, I haven't forgotten that I owe you some prints! They are sitting on my table right now, waiting for me to spot them. Thank you for your generosity and patience.
If you are scanning, here's what I recommend:
1) If you can tolerate the lower film speed, you have got to try Fuji Acros in XTOL.
2) Kodak TMY2 in XTOL is very good and scans well. Probably your best "direct" replacement.
3) If you can tolerate more grain, the easiest combination is Tri-X 400 in in Diafine and you want to shoot it at ASA 800 to 1250.
4) If you don't mind using a processing lab and have a good lab available, you might want to consider Ilford XP2 or Kodak BW400CN chromogenic films. Some people love them, some people hate them, some folks like to do their own developing... what ever. Having worked with the chromogenic films, the negative have great tonality, scan well, and fine grain.
or, you can make me an offer on all the TXP that stocked up on.![]()
)
