Two tripods: Architecture with Chamonix 45H-1

Leofoto LS-255C Ranger Series Tripod​

Doremus Scudder said:

It really depends on two things: First, how tall a tripod you need (if there's a difference in height between the two models) and, secondly, how and how far you plan to carry the tripod. If you're really comfortable carrying a larger and bulkier tripod, then you'll be assured of stability.

However, if a larger tripod would keep you from going certain places, shorten your work day or otherwise be awkward, then go for a smaller, lighter tripod.

FWIW, I shot on the streets and sidewalks of Vienna, Austria (where I lived for 30 years) by transporting my 4x5 kit (Wista SW, four lenses, spotmeter, etc.) in a rolling backpack on my back with my tripod strapped onto the rear rack of my bicycle. My tripod was a lightweight Bogen/Manfrotto 3205 fitted with a 3-way 3025 head. I don't think the Berlebach would have been even possible in that scenario.

Keep in mind that all you really need is a fraction of a second of absolute stillness from your tripod. Yes, there are vibrations from passing traffic, etc., but those you can wait out usually. You can hang things from the tripod to help it damp vibrations as well (my filmholder pouch was always on the tripod and a carry a nylon bag that I can hang from the center column after filling it with stuff). Waiting till things are still before tripping the shutter is the trick. Not so difficult in architectural photography, since your subjects aren't moving that much

Best,

Doremus

Click to expand...

DREW WILEY said:

I disagree with Doremus - the more solid the tripod the better. Why gamble? Architectural shots might take take several seconds or even much longer, depending. And outdoor situations potentially imply wind. A 6 or 7 lb tripod is comparatively nothing to tote around compared to an 8x10 kit. I do have a solid rigid first version Gitzo CF Reporter tripod less than 4 lbs suitable for attaching a lightwt 4x5 field camera directly attached to the platform top, or even a Sinar F monorail via its own rail clamp. It will even fit within a regulation airline carry-on. But I really prefer my lighter weight Ries wooden one whenever possible. Some of those Leofotos look way too spindly and vibration prone. And as usual, the weakest link is often the tripod head itself. You don't even need one. Your camera has a VH reversible back, and the leveling is easily done with leg adjustments only. Avoid ball heads like the plague. Throw away any center column, or save it for blowing poison darts in the jungle.

Click to expand...

_T_ said:

If you’re thinking of the leofoto I would not go with the ranger series. That’s their lightweight travel tripod range and they are not suited to such large cameras especially outdoors and with long exposures.

The summit series has several sets of legs that would work better depending on what specs you need.

Click to expand...

bdial said:

The Berlebach will be faster to set up, since you’ll only need to deal with 3 leg clamps instead of potentially 12. I’m going to speculate that the weight capacity specs are probably more reliable on the Berlebach than the Leofoto.

Click to expand...

Besk said:

I use a heavier, aluminum, older 340 series Gitzo tripod for my Sinar for architecture etc.
For field use with my other, lighter 4x5's I use a Gitzo carbon fiber 1228 tripod.

The Berlebach would be very nice but doesn't collapse to a very small package. Does it have rubber feet for sidewalks? (Edit- Yes it does.) I am not familiar with Leofoto tripods.

Click to expand...

Mick Fagan said:

I have the Berlabach Report 3042, which appears to be identical to the current Report 302; I think they dropped the third number on these tripods quite some years ago.

Mine has the centre levelling ball in the head, which to me is really good. It allows me to set the tripod up with the legs in their best position, sometimes in cracks or holes in pavement, then after getting the head more or less even, one then very quickly positions the centre ball to get the spirit level showing level, one is then able to attach the camera and off you go. This is a very speedy set-up system, which in an urban environment can be an asset; it is to me.

One thing I would suggest is to get their steel chain accessory, which simply slips onto each leg. This stops the rubberised feet slipping or sliding in ways you don't need or want. Or, you can manufacture one yourself out of various materials.

Stainless Steel Chain Report from Berlebach ® Tripods

Berlebach Stainless Steel Chain Report: Stainless steel Chain 3x 60 cm

www.berlebach.de

I mainly use this tripod with my Shen Hao HZX45-IIA camera, average weight of camera and lens would be around the 3.5kg to 4kg mark. It works very well with this camera size in all situations. I also use it with my Toyo 54G, (shown below) which is a somewhat heavier monorail, it does the job, but with the camera and other stuff somewhere around 7kg-8kg with various lenses the tripod knows its working, but handles the weight well; if you know what I mean.

My tripod came with a 100mm centre column, I have the accessory 500mm centre column, it takes a minute or two to change them over. After about 10 years of use, I decided to leave the longer centre column in as for all intents and purposes, the extra weight was minimal.

For vibration absorption, this tripod is the most vibrationless tripod I've personally owned.

The Achilles heal of this camera is that it doesn't fold up super small, apart from that, I think it is perfect for my usage.


View attachment 359675

View attachment 359676

Click to expand...

Doremus Scudder said:

A question: Why aren't you looking at Gitzo and Manfrotto tripods as well. Is there something special about Leofoto?

And, to agree with Drew somewhat A spindly tripod that won't do the job isn't worth having. There are smaller aluminum tripods that are relatively lightweight and quite stable that you can consider. I was simply assuming that you've researched the Leofoto tripod and know that it's stable enough to do the job. If there's a question about stability with the Ranger series (as the post above suggests), then widening your search might be a good idea.

Get a quality tripod that will do the job in the largest size that fits your working style. My working style was schlepping my kit around the city on a bicycle; I needed a compact and lightweight kit. If you're going to be driving and setting up from your car, that's not a consideration. If you're going to be carrying everything around on foot, then you need to objectively assess your abilities in that regard.

If I remember correctly, my 3205 Manfrotto (probably has a different number now...) extends to 56" and collapses down to 26.5". The 3021 is a bit larger, extends to 71" and collapses down quite small to 26". Either would be stable enough for your 2.5-pound camera even with a longer lens (I use Wista DXs and an SW with mine and lenses up to 300mm).

Best,

Doremus

Click to expand...

Darryl Roberts said:

My budget is around $300.

Click to expand...

• 5 pounds
• < $300
• 52 inches, collapses to 25 inches
• WOOD

Darryl Roberts said:

I've decided to go with the Berlebach TRIPOD REPORT 803:

• 5 pounds
• < $300
• 52 inches, collapses to 25 inches
• WOOD

Thank you all for your insightful responses.

Click to expand...