• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Two Different Chromes.....

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here Agfachrome 50 slide film was always sold with its own mailer package; and only one (maybe two) places in the US could develop it. My older brother shot it in 4x5 sheet film for nature image income, and did quite well in that respect; and about 25 years later I printed some of them on Cibachrome. I still have those old sheets somewhere in storage here, as well as a number of my own slides. It had a unique look, completely different from the next round of Agfachrome sheet film.
 
lamerko said:
but I don't expect any great results
Click to expand...

Make experiment with over exposure and filters. I have seen some results of them, they tend to be in magenta cast due to the lost of ISO spec.
 
Yes, I will do a lot of experiments - I have a lot of these photo films
And while looking through my stock notes (I keep a lot of the photo material in a remote location) it turns out that I also have a few Agfacrome CT 100s from the same period (expired in 1987)
That's good - there will be a head-to-head matchup between East and West
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2023-02-10 004041.jpg
    152.3 KB · Views: 82
I Have some Agfa CNS. Developed in cold 41, but nothing come out.
Even already exposed part from the very beginning was tinny.
Is it possible that film has lost ISO performance so badly?
 
Agfachrome was my slide film of choice when photographing people. It gave a very pleasant shading quite different from the boldness of Kodachrome.
 
svetoklik said:
I Have some Agfa CNS. Developed in cold 41, but nothing come out.
Even already exposed part from the very beginning was tinny.
Is it possible that film has lost ISO performance so badly?
Click to expand...

I would guess a development issue...
 
lamerko said:
I would guess a development issue...
Click to expand...

Have you any suggestions please?
It was overexposed like from basic recommendation and developed in commercial lab on low temperature in C41.
 
Different generations of Agfachrome. The earlier Agfachrome 50 had much higher contrast than Kodachrome. Only the later version of Agfachrome could be described as "pleasantly shaded" or suitable for typical portrait photography. Almost opposites.
 
Agfachrome in its later rendition was never all that popular. But I recall it being sold in 4X5 sheets at one big camera stores in this area in the 80's. What I loved for portraiture was Agfachrome 1000, which was available maybe fifteen years longer. Unlike their slower speed films, it was very grainy, but with a wonderfully soft palette well suited to portraiture; something really unique in the category of chrome films, and available only in 35mm and 120 rolls.
 
Back in the late 70s and early 80s, all I used were Agfa products? Why? Well I worked at Colour Processing Laboratories in Warren street London. Who also had the Agfa school of photography. All the film, processing and paper I needed for free. They even sent me to college for 3 years. The Agfa 50sand 50L was a very long process in time and length compared to kodaks E3, - E6 process. It was also a bugger to dupe, and retouch. I think that is why it fell from favour.
 

In the case of DDR support for Arab countries, the deciding vote was on the side of the CCCP. They were eager to send support to brotherly countries at the expense of their satellites.
{moderator's note - see post that follows - please do not continue discussion of the political issues raised in the thread}
 
Last edited by a moderator:
adamlugi said:
In the case of DDR support for Arab countries, the deciding vote was on the side of the CCCP. They were eager to send support to brotherly countries at the expense of their satellites.
Click to expand...

From the moderators:
This is a current response to a discussion from more than three years ago.
It is a response to an entire line of political/historical discussion from three years ago that, in the meantime, we have come to the realization is of a type - "political discussion" - that we ought to now restrict ere on this site focused on photography.
So with respect to the three year old material, a mea culpa.
Although interesting and most likely informative, further political discussion posts to the thread will be deleted.
We would encourage those who are interested in such topics to take discussion to non-photographic centred sites better suited to them.
 
After further discussion, and noting the fact that the thread was dormant for over three years, we have decided to lock this thread. If anyone has new, non-political information about the original subject that they wish to add, just Report this post with a request to re-open the thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Menu
Log in
Register