Quick question....
I just got a new pinhole camera (Ilford Obscura) and am using Ilford direct positive paper. I tried to take some shots in my studio using continuous tungsten lighting. I had a ton of issues in terms of exposure. I am guessing there is some sort of issue using tungsten lights with direct positive paper.
For my studio setup I started off using (1) 1K Arri fresnel. I was running a shutter of 5 minutes. I got nothing. I kept upping the exposure time until I was up to 20 minutes. At that time, I could get an image to register, but just barely. I added (2) more lights and it didn't seem to make much difference.
I tested the camera out the next day while outside and I got a great image after about 1:30.
With the amount of light I was using in the studio I could have fried an egg. There has to be a technical reason why the film was not reacting to very directional and intense tungsten lighting.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
JD
I just got a new pinhole camera (Ilford Obscura) and am using Ilford direct positive paper. I tried to take some shots in my studio using continuous tungsten lighting. I had a ton of issues in terms of exposure. I am guessing there is some sort of issue using tungsten lights with direct positive paper.
For my studio setup I started off using (1) 1K Arri fresnel. I was running a shutter of 5 minutes. I got nothing. I kept upping the exposure time until I was up to 20 minutes. At that time, I could get an image to register, but just barely. I added (2) more lights and it didn't seem to make much difference.
I tested the camera out the next day while outside and I got a great image after about 1:30.
With the amount of light I was using in the studio I could have fried an egg. There has to be a technical reason why the film was not reacting to very directional and intense tungsten lighting.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
JD