Trying RA-4 Rev. Process

The Kildare Track

A
The Kildare Track

  • 9
  • 3
  • 81
Stranger Things.

A
Stranger Things.

  • 1
  • 1
  • 50
Centre Lawn

A
Centre Lawn

  • 2
  • 2
  • 58

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,909
Messages
2,782,950
Members
99,745
Latest member
Larryjohn
Recent bookmarks
0

FilmIs4Ever

Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Messages
377
Location
Cleveland, O
I'm hereby christening it "RR-4" from now on. Hope this is OK.

One thing I'm doing different with RR-4 is I'll be tray-processing to start, but will be doing standard-temperature RA-4 thereon out, using Supra.

Could this possibly lead to any sort of reticulation or pinholing?

Also, I hear that this process leads to excessive contrast.

If I were to flash, would I want to use the same filter pack as for printing the chrome?

Finally, what's a good starting filter pack? YC not MY, right?

Has anyone tried this with K64? That is what I'll be printing.


Regards.
 
OP
OP

FilmIs4Ever

Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Messages
377
Location
Cleveland, O
Oh, and for the sake of processor control, would it be best to try to keep water off the print before feeding it into the machine? I could squeegee it or air dry the print in the dark after the exposure.

I take it, because of a lack of a bleach before 2nd (color) developer, too much exposure is bad? Or is exposure still to completion? Without a bleach before-hand, I'd think too much reexposure could cause a printing-out effect on remaining silver halides preventing them from color-developing in the RA-4 developer.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Karl;

Add 50 M and 1 stop to your regular exposure for RA4 paper. Do not use Fuji paper, it does not work.

It is very high contrast. I use Dektol 1:3 for the 1st developer. I use RA-RT developer replenisher/ no starter for the color developer.

Good luck.

PE
 

Domin

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2006
Messages
204
Location
Warszawa, Po
Format
Med. Format RF
One thing I'm doing different with RR-4 is I'll be tray-processing to start, but will be doing standard-temperature RA-4 thereon out, using Supra.
Regards.

Do you mean Supra with number or Supra Endura? The former won't work.
 

naknak

Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2007
Messages
657
Location
Athens/Greec
Format
35mm
If you want my advice forget trays. You can't work in total darkness, so there is no help or need doing it. Buy the Jobo drum 1525,Tank system 1500,expose the negative and then put the paper into the drum.It works with 50(less) to 100(max) ml diluted solution. 45 to 60sec. color developer (CD) time and the same goes for Bleach Fix (BX). Washing between CD and BX. Don't forget continuous agitation (rolling it with your hands) and good luck. Temperature tolerance 18 to 25 Celsius.

Kyprianos
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
I use trays all the time with good results. I use a WR 13 safelight with a 15 watt bulb about 5 feet away directed at the ceiling. I can see just fine.

PE
 

naknak

Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2007
Messages
657
Location
Athens/Greec
Format
35mm
I'm using Fujicolor paper in MY filtration.Here a sample
3043811804_5212753512_o.jpg


Kyprianos
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
The people who have tried reversal processing of Fuji CA paper, have so far, reported failure for a variety of reasons. There was quite a discussion about this over several threads on PN. Your results are excellent. Would you post your process?

PE
 

naknak

Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2007
Messages
657
Location
Athens/Greec
Format
35mm
If something goes wrong I prefer to reprint.No safe lights,visibility low, aged ocular nerve.

Kyprianos
 

Anon Ymous

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
Messages
3,661
Location
Greece
Format
35mm
I use trays all the time with good results. I use a WR 13 safelight with a 15 watt bulb about 5 feet away directed at the ceiling. I can see just fine.
PE

Hello PE,

could you please provide some information about that safelight? Is it just a filter? Availability? Google didn't reveal anything.

BTW, Kodak papers seem to have very low sensitivity at about 580nm, according to tech pub E4021. Would it be worthy to make a LED safelight?
 

naknak

Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2007
Messages
657
Location
Athens/Greec
Format
35mm
The proccess: Tetenal RA 4, Fujicolor Crystall Archive bulk roll paper (90mx20cm) in M 50, Y 90 3,8sec exp.time. Meopta Opemus Color 4 Head, Rodenstock 2,8/50. I usually develop the paper at room temperature which is about 20 and 24 Celsius (sometimes reaches 30 degrees but it happens rarely in the summer) and plain household running water of same temperature. Tolerance of paper and chemicals are excellent even beyond the recommended (high) boarders. I've made prints at 29 Celsius by lessening the developing/fixing times.

Kyprianos

Picture comes from a color negative film (KODAK Profoto 100). It isn't a reversal process. Count my post as O/T.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Anon Ymous

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
Messages
3,661
Location
Greece
Format
35mm
Eh, never mind PE... you use a kodak 13 safelight filter. It's interesting that you use a 15W bulb though. It's twice the recommended! How long do you keep the light on?
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Well, first, Kyprianos, look at the original post. He is doing reversal processing of the negative paper to get a positive print from a slide! This is a cross process. You are doing a normal process. I hope I clarified things..

Anon;

I use a 15 watt bulb in one and a 7 watt bulb in another and both use WR-13. They are on for the total process time. It presents no problem if they are not directly on the paper. Mine are both pointed away with the 7 W being a bit closer.

PE
 

David Grenet

Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2007
Messages
309
Location
Sydney, Aust
Format
Multi Format
I played with this process early this year and posted results (there was a url link here which no longer exists). I found that (surprisingly) the Fuji CA did work, although unfortunately I have been rather distracted by uni ever since and don't have any more results (I can't remember the last time I had time to spend in the darkroom :sad: )

Hope this helps,

David.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom