Thanks to APUG in general, for the road that I took, that has led me to publish this page.
And a special shout out goes to Fred Aspen who over the past two days ran a test that proves that this is valid.
With a little allowance for poetic license, I think film testing can be summed on one page.
http://www.beefalobill.com/images/CallingYourShot-Trust.pdf
Why couldn't guns go digital instead of cameras and film?
I clicked your link, or at least I thought I did, and all I got was a Dinah Shore recording.
It WAS a Dinah Shore recording.
Wait! Let me get this straight. Film manufacturing companies ARE NOT lying to me about the speed of their films? :munch:
Thanks Sirius,
It keeps getting distilled down...
With fresh film and standard developer you don't need sensitometry.
With sensitometry you don't need fresh film or standard developer.
Back when Dinah Shore was making records Kodak used to lie about film speed. They were afraid Joe Lunchpail would underexpose Verichrome Pan and the company thought it was better if they overexposed.
PS I clicked the wrong button and that's why I got Dinah. Anybody got Julie London and "Cry Me A River"?
But, but, but the testanistas will have nothing to do.
Nicely done, Bill!
This happened to me yesterday. My wife caught me in an uncharacteristically bold comment and she said "You can't say that" to which I tried to backpedal "Well, I'm not saying THAT" and her retort was "You did say THAT" - and she was right.
I am talking about a revolution... But I'm not talking about a revolution.
There will always be a place in my heart for testing to bring a deeper understanding.
Women dont actually listen to what you say but interpret their version by the way you say it.
I find that I get in the most trouble when I don't know what it was that I did to get in trouble.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?