Tripod heads: Ball or 3-way?

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
184,389
Messages
2,561,915
Members
96,061
Latest member
JoeBlow
Recent bookmarks
0

Kate Mocak

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2003
Messages
101
Location
Slovakia
I'm going to buy Manfrotto 055PRO tripod (without head). What kind of head would you recommend: ball or 3-way? What are the pros and cons of each? Do you have any preferred type?

Thanks for advice.
Kate
 

jrong

Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2003
Messages
125
Location
London, Engl
Format
Multi Format
I personally prefer ballheads for speed and convenience. I had a cheap pan-and-tilt head once and struggled with it, and never got used to it, although many say its a matter of getting used to it. I've heard that pan-and-tilt heads are better for macro photography and the like, but since I almost never do that, life has become cheerier since the purchase of my ballhead. :smile:

If you do decide to go with a ballhead, do find one that is the appropriate size and weight for your equipment, particularly if you have heavy lenses. It's usually a compromise between ballhead weight (some weigh a tonne) and the weight of gear it can support. I use a Markins ballhead after reading rave reviews about it on the Nikonians website, and I certainly have nothing but good things to say about it. It is fully compatible with the Swiss-Arca system and its plates. Check out the Nikonians website for more extensive reviews on this ballhead, but I have no complaints! I used a cheaper Manfrotto 438RC ballhead before but got rid of it after I found it a little clumsy with vertical compositions.

Your mileage may vary, good luck.
Jin
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,906
Location
Honolulu, Ha
Format
Large Format
It's one of those things that's a personal choice, and you really need to try them out for yourself.

I prefer three-way pan heads, because I like things to be square and straight and it's easier to do that when you can control the three rotation axes separately.

Ball heads, though, are more compact and quick to adjust, particularly for moving subjects. I have a small Linhof ballhead on my little travel tripod, which I use for my smaller rangefinder cameras or even my ultralight 4x5" Gowland.
 

dr bob

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
870
Location
Annapolis, M
Format
Medium Format
After more than fifty years of trudging about with all kinds of equipment, I have yet to find the need for a ball-head tripod. Caveat: I don't do nature (or children on the loose) for which one might be preferable.
 

Adrian Twiss

Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Messages
618
Location
Wigan (oop N
Format
Multi Format
As a landscape and architecture fan I find the 3 way head more convenient. I always had trouble squaring everything up with a ball head. It's really horses for courses.

Adrian
 

paul ron

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2004
Messages
2,666
Location
NYC
Format
Medium Format
I have 2 Bogen tilt/pan tripod heads for sale. e-mail me if you are interested, I have a 3126-$35 and a 3047-$45

automax1@juno.com
 

ThomHarrop

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
172
Location
Denver, CO
Format
4x5 Format
I have used both types and find the ballhead much more convenient. I first started using it when I was on staff at Outdoor Photographer magazine on the recommendation of one of the contributors. A good ballhead is fast and smooth and I can level mine faster then I can level a 3 handle model. I have a heavy duty Bogen (Manfrotto) and love it.
 
Joined
Apr 20, 2003
Messages
1,626
Location
Southern Cal
Format
Large Format
I have each for different sized cameras, The only extra thought I have, with the larger cameras, 5x7 and up it is easier with the 3 way because you can adjust one direction at a time. Personally I prefer the ball heads for speed and flexibility. You do need to keeep the ball lubricated though.
 

Jim Chinn

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Messages
2,512
Location
Omaha, Nebra
Format
Multi Format
I have always found a three way much easier to square and level the camera, which for LF is essential before you apply movements. For 35mm or MF a ball head is probably quicker to use.
 

pierre

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2003
Messages
97
Location
Ottawa
Format
Medium Format
I had a pan head before, and I let myself be seduced by everyone recommending a ball head a year ago. My conclusion: I much prefer a pan head. I find it gives a more precise control, plus, you don't need a mega-bucks panhead for it to work well, while I'm not sure I would say the same about ballheads.
 

david b

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
4,026
Location
None of your
Format
Medium Format
I am using a bogen carbon fiber 3443 with Kirk BH-3 and love it. Light weight and very easy to use for landscapes and portraits.
 
OP
OP

Kate Mocak

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2003
Messages
101
Location
Slovakia
Thank you all for your insightful comments. Preferences seem to be roughly 50/50 but it's easier for me to make a decision now when I know your arguments.

Best regards,
Kate
 

AllanD

Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2003
Messages
121
Location
UK
Format
Medium Format
Sorry if this reply is late. I started out using a ball head with 35mm and medium format and they are indeed quick and easy to setup. I just wish I'd bought the bigger ball; the one with the friction control.

I now use a pan and tilt. No sudden changes of camera position = no sudden changes of center of gravity = no sudden contact between camera and ground !
 

skahde

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2004
Messages
407
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
FLM makes a ballhead which will not tilt sideways if an additional clamp is locked. Once tripod and camera are level and this clamp has been fixed adjusting the camera becomes more like working with a two-way pan-tilt head. All in all it is a nice head which replaced my Linhof Pro III.

Here is a description/praise of this head (Workshop- 2 -> "An exceptional ballhead"): http://www.poelking.de/index_e.htm

best

Stefan
 

haris

Well, if you will do panning with your camera(following subject while it moves) it is easier to do with 3-way than ball head. You can, for example, have fixed vertical movement and have free only horizontal movement fot taking photo of moving car while follow its moving. With ball head you will have horizontal and vertical movements free at same time which can be problem if you need vertical or horizontal strictly fixed...
 

glbeas

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 25, 2002
Messages
3,876
Location
Marietta, Ga. USA
Format
Multi Format
Some ball heads have a separate pan swivel with a lock lever at the bottom. I had one for a while but it annoyed me because I was always grabbing the wrong lever to adjust the thing. I sold it and got the simpler version.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom