• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Triotar or xenar

Forum statistics

Threads
202,513
Messages
2,841,742
Members
101,359
Latest member
OrionQV
Recent bookmarks
0

ronlamarsh

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 2, 2004
Messages
461
Location
Seattle Wash
Format
Multi Format
I have a Rolleicord II K3 in excellent condition and scrapped a beat up later model for the screen and mirror. The question is should I or can I also exchange the lenses as the scrap camera had a xenar in great condition. The exsisting Triotar is spotless also.
 
Are you going to take color or bw?

xnr75apx100007456wo5.jpg

Xenar, Rolleiflex T

trotrapx1000060981zu3.jpg

Triotar, Rolleicord II

Xenar is more modern lens, sharper to the corners, more contrasty and better in color. But Triotar is also nice lens for soft tone. It makes good portrait with beautiful bokeh, but it makes flare very often as well. I like both and it would be hard for me to decide.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Xenar hands down over the triotar. The triotar is a triplet, the Xenar is a Tessar-type 4 element design.
 
Xenar is more modern lens, sharper to the corners, more contrasty and better in color. But Triotar is also nice lens for soft tone. It makes good portrait with beautiful bokeh, but it makes flare very often as well. I like both and it would be hard for me to decide.

Very well said.

My Rolleicord has a Xenar, and it's a really excellent lens with a lot of character, your basic good example of a Tessar-type lens. But I think the potential of good triplets is really underrated, and a Triotar should be reliably a good triplet. My inclination would be to leave the original body and lens together unless there's a specific reason *not* to, but it's really a judgement call.

-NT
 
The Carl Zeiss Triotar is a well-designed triplet.

As others have pointed out, the Xenar is a four-element Tessar-type design and performs much like a Tessar. Very sharp with round out-of-focus areas when shot wide open to about f/5.6 at medium distances.

If you make the swap, you must ensure that the lens is collimated correctly to ensure accurate focusing at infinity and other distances.
 
Somewhere I have a Triotar, off a long gone Rolleicord, it wasn't a bad lens, even with E6, but I'd far rather have a Xenar or modern (50's onwards) Tessar.

If you can set the Xenar up to focus correctly then you'll have a great camera, capable of excellent results.

Ian
 
Are they both the same focal length? If not, you may need to change the viewing lens as well. Probably a good idea anyway.


Steve.
 
I wouldn't exchange the lenses. You would have to adjust the focus. The Triotar is one of the best three element lenses, soft fully open and very sharp stopped down. If you want a Rolleicord with Xenar, they aren't that expensive. I've had three Rolleicords with Xenar. Two of the Xenars were bad, and lacked the biting sharpness (yes they were checked and collimated). I have five Rolleicords with Triotar at the moment, and all of them are very good. Only the 3,8 Triotar on my Rolleicord I is soft.

Triotar 4,5/75mm:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you all for your input I think I'll keep the original camera as is now that I have a mirror and focus screen for it from the scrapped unit.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom