Tri-X In TMax Dev # EI 3200, nice

IMG_3344.jpeg

A
IMG_3344.jpeg

  • 2
  • 2
  • 3
Sunlit veranda

A
Sunlit veranda

  • 5
  • 1
  • 46
Free!

D
Free!

  • 5
  • 0
  • 31
Near my home.jpg

A
Near my home.jpg

  • 7
  • 2
  • 110
Woodland Shoppers

A
Woodland Shoppers

  • 1
  • 0
  • 69

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,473
Messages
2,775,774
Members
99,628
Latest member
DanielCTracht
Recent bookmarks
2

htmlguru4242

Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2005
Messages
1,012
Location
Eastern NC, USA
Format
Multi Format
I just ran some Tri-X through TMax dev (exposed @ EI 3200), and I must say that the images are pretty good. The shadow detail is a tad lower than with D-76, though the grain is lower, and base fog is _nonexistant_. The results are, hands-down, much better than those from Delta 3200.

The contrast is very high, but certainly useful.

They are truly the best high-speed negs. that I have ever seenn and its quite encouraging. If I could just give the shadows a little boost, there would be no reson not to use this for general work.

They're still wet, so no scans yet ...

The real test is going to be the grain in the prints, which I'll probably make early next week (contact sheet tomorrow afternoon). We'll see.

I'll post scans when the contact print is ready.
 

Konical

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 1, 2003
Messages
1,824
Good Afternoon,

Roll film? Sheet film? Time? Dilution? Type of agitation?

Konical
 
OP
OP
htmlguru4242

htmlguru4242

Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2005
Messages
1,012
Location
Eastern NC, USA
Format
Multi Format
Oops

Good Afternoon,

Roll film? Sheet film? Time? Dilution? Type of agitation?

Konical


Ahh - yes, I can't believe I forgot that ... Temp, Time and Dilution.

Ok, so:

TMax 1:4 (a little stronger, actually), 75ºF, constant agitation for the first minute, agitation for 10 seconds every 40 seconds thereafter; constant agitation for the last 30 seconds.
 
OP
OP
htmlguru4242

htmlguru4242

Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2005
Messages
1,012
Location
Eastern NC, USA
Format
Multi Format
OK, so I printed an 8x10 of this, just to see how it'd come out, and it's actually not too bad. The print is a bit overexposed, and I'm going to have to do some work to get the shadows to come out better, but oh well.

My scanner is TERRIBLE, so it doesn't do this justice ... I brightened it up in Photoshop a tad; the blacks really are black, not grey as the look here ... but oh well.

And yes, that "noise" on the book in the lower left is grain.
 

Attachments

  • Picture.jpg
    Picture.jpg
    36 KB · Views: 118

agGNOME

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2005
Messages
217
Location
New Orleans,
Format
Multi Format
htmlguru4242 said:
They are truly the best high-speed negs. that I have ever seenn and its quite encouraging. If I could just give the shadows a little boost, there would be no reson not to use this for general work.

oops, I had a different film in mind than the one in your post.
Deleted original post. Have you considered giving Xtol a try?
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom