Andrew Horodysky
Hi everyone,
I recently shot a couple of rolls of TRI-X (135) at EI 800 -- portraits, using window lighting (testing out a newly acquired Canon F-1N).
I'd like to know if anyone has experiences with both XTOL and Microphen. And, what are the property differences, visually,
between these two developers, with a moderate (800) push. I've used TRI-X/XTOL at lower EI(s), and with other films, but haven't
tried Microphen. What are your thoughts?
Thanks,
Andrew
PS -- OOPS! Sorry, this is awfully close to the previous thread. Comments appreciated, nonetheless.
I recently shot a couple of rolls of TRI-X (135) at EI 800 -- portraits, using window lighting (testing out a newly acquired Canon F-1N).
I'd like to know if anyone has experiences with both XTOL and Microphen. And, what are the property differences, visually,
between these two developers, with a moderate (800) push. I've used TRI-X/XTOL at lower EI(s), and with other films, but haven't
tried Microphen. What are your thoughts?
Thanks,
Andrew
PS -- OOPS! Sorry, this is awfully close to the previous thread. Comments appreciated, nonetheless.