Travel Camera - what have you found that works

St. Clair Beach Solitude

D
St. Clair Beach Solitude

  • 8
  • 2
  • 104
Reach for the sky

H
Reach for the sky

  • 3
  • 4
  • 141
Agawa Canyon

A
Agawa Canyon

  • 3
  • 2
  • 174

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,873
Messages
2,782,391
Members
99,738
Latest member
fergusfan
Recent bookmarks
0

Arcadia4

Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2018
Messages
319
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
For travel photography where its taking some pics whilst travelling, (rather than travelling to take pics), the key thing is having less time and not being the person with a ton of gear in a group etc. Therefore my choice is a fujifilm ga645 for medium format, particularly for a couple of rolls. Its compact, light and low fuss in ca. 38mm equiv view ideal for city breaks/general snapshots etc. Range also has -
w offers 28mm equiv.
z offers a tele so best of both worlds, albeit with the risk of premature death due to ribbon failure.
 

mgb74

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 24, 2005
Messages
4,774
Location
MN and MA US
Format
Multi Format
Similar situation for an upcoming trip. Will be flying to Santa Fe (for a wedding) so size and weight an issue. Expect to be hiking and sightseeing with wife so photography is secondary.

Considered my Bessa II as the most bang for the size and weight. But the 105mm lens is longer than I would like for this trip. Same issue with my other folders; all approximately "normal" lenses and I'd like something wider. An issue with most, though not all, fixed lens cameras.

Another thought was my ETRS with a 50mm, WLF, and one back. Eliminate the speed grip and it's fairly light and compact. But I might just end up taking a MX or ME Super with 28mm and 50mm. However, if I had one of the Fuji 645s, that's what I'd take.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,301
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
My own preference for weight/bulk consideration will generally be a folder. I've got two 6x6 folders with rangefinder, Super Ikonta B 532/16 and a Mamiya Six; I could carry both and still take less space and weigh less than a Hasselblad with one lens and film back, or my RB67 with one lens and film back. Lenses aren't fast (f/2.8 on the Super Ikonta, f/3.5 on the Mamiya), but fast film will cover that pretty well (P3200 or Delta 3200). Best get the film where you're going ahead of you, though; flying with film gets less reasonable every year.
 

mgb74

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 24, 2005
Messages
4,774
Location
MN and MA US
Format
Multi Format
... Best get the film where you're going ahead of you, though; flying with film gets less reasonable every year.

A very good point. I'll mail to the hotel or to a local US Post Office with "Hold for Pickup".
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,369
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Similar situation for an upcoming trip. Will be flying to Santa Fe (for a wedding) so size and weight an issue. Expect to be hiking and sightseeing with wife so photography is secondary.

Considered my Bessa II as the most bang for the size and weight. But the 105mm lens is longer than I would like for this trip. Same issue with my other folders; all approximately "normal" lenses and I'd like something wider. An issue with most, though not all, fixed lens cameras.

Another thought was my ETRS with a 50mm, WLF, and one back. Eliminate the speed grip and it's fairly light and compact. But I might just end up taking a MX or ME Super with 28mm and 50mm. However, if I had one of the Fuji 645s, that's what I'd take.

New Mexico is the only (?) state which does not an airport in the state capital. You have to fly into Albuquerque.
 

Roger Thoms

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Messages
1,776
Location
Flagstaff, AZ
Format
8x10 Format
If I want to go ultra light I use a Fuji GS645S, the one with the little roll bar. Not my favorite camera as I find the ergonomics a little awkward, but I like the results. It’s also the same aspect ratio as my 680 Fuji’s which is nice.

Roger
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2016
Messages
1,274
Location
Calexico, CA
Format
Multi Format
If packing light I usually bring a light 35mm (like a Leica M6 or Olympus OM) but if I would like to bring Medium Format, I usually pack a Rolleiflex 2.8C or another light TLR, like a Rolleicord or a Yashica TLR. Not usually get restricted by the single focal lenght.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,301
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
New Mexico is the only (?) state which does not an airport in the state capital. You have to fly into Albuquerque.

Well, Santa Fe does have an airport, but it's for light planes only, no passenger jets. Might be commuter plane feeder flights -- it's listed as "Regional" airport.
 

MARTIE

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
266
Format
Multi Format
My camera of choice when photography is not the primary objective is the Fuji GA645Zi. It has an accurate meter (eliminating the need to carry an external meter), it's light enough to handhold even down to fairly slow shutter speeds, and it's pretty much auto-everything. I can snap a pic quickly and move on without missing a beat!
+1
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,369
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Well, Santa Fe does have an airport, but it's for light planes only, no passenger jets. Might be commuter plane feeder flights -- it's listed as "Regional" airport.

That is what I meant. A few years ago I could not even find a commuter flight in and out of Santa Fe.
 

Light Capture

Advertiser
Joined
Feb 5, 2008
Messages
224
Location
Ontario, Canada
Format
Multi Format
I don't think there's much weight or space saving between Fuji folder and Rollei (it does depend on Rollei type slightly). Hasselblad already packs smaller or same as my 35mm setup (same bag too). Rollei is even smaller. There's no temptation to add one more back or lens or something else.
For me familiarity with camera trumps the potential weight or space savings unless space or weight are strictly restricted like they are on some small flights or for long hikes.
 

mrosenlof

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Messages
621
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format
It really depends on the trip for me. I'm traveling right now (hawaii) and have a Canham wood 4x5 and a Fuji GW690ii. This trip is primarily for photography. A couple of trips I've taken a Hasselblad V and the 120 macro, and at least one added the 250mm to the V kit. I'm hiking to the bottom of the grand canyon in a few months and will probably take a Mamiya TLR and the 135mm.
 

Anaxagore

Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2005
Messages
135
Format
Medium Format
I think it depends of the travel location… I took my Rollei 6008 (one lens only, 2 film magazines) to hike in the Rocky mountains, and although I got some good pictures, I think my Agfa Automatic folder would have been easier to carry… I took this folder to every geology field trip I did. A TLR could be a good option as long as you keep it out of its case (otherwise that makes it more difficult to change the film without having a table).
 

Down Under

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
1,086
Location
The universe
Format
Multi Format
A very positive thread!! So much good advice and information here - what I'm getting out of it is, there isn't any such thing as THE ideal (or dare I say it - perfect) camera for travel. It all boils down to what suits the individual traveler best. Each and every one of us has his/her preferred camera/s, all for our own reasons, the one/s we use best and feel happiest with when we are on the road. As it should be.

After years of traveling with my Nikon kits, like many of us here I'm getting on a bit and I no longer want to cart around say a D700 or D800 with a grip and a kit of lenses. So lighter and smaller is better for me.

When I can get out of Australia again (soon, I hope, Malaysia will reopen to foreign tourists next month and I'm hoping Indonesia will give up its idiotic visa and quarantine regulations so I can get back there and resume my explorations for old Indies architecture and ancient temples) I will probably take two kits with me. Like others, a Rolleicord Vb with a 16 exposure kit, a few accessories, a small meter and 20 rolls of film in a metal K-ration can I bought in the '70s for the express purpose of carting film around, will suit my B&W film shooting urges.

I found it interesting that the Rolleicord wins out with many posters. For reasons obvious . Not too expensive to buy, the accessories are bayonet I and can bebought cheaply, it's light, easy to work with, and a fun camera. My second choice would be one of my two Rolleiflex Ts with a '16 kit, but my pair are almost mint, so I hesitate to fling them into a backpack or a crumpler bag for some of the rough outings I do when I'm in the tropics.

Digitally (and let's face it, we all take one with us, don't we?), the Nikon DSLRs are too heavy for me now, so a recently purchased Fujifilm XT-1 with two lenses, the oustandingly good 18-55 kit zoom and the other maybe an 18 (= 28mm) or 23 (35mm), will do everything I want.

I quite fancy the idea of going with a Fuji GA or GS (ideally one of the 'W' models as the 28mm optics suit my way of seeing) as they seem to be ideal one-size-fits-all shooters. Or to go ultra light, which appeals to me more and more as I crawl and creep into my mid-70s, one of my folders, either the circa 1950 Zeiss Nettar with an Albada finder or a Voigtlander Perkeo I with a lens hood and a yellow-green filter. Minimalist to the core. Less is bess... best, sorry!!

Many thanks to all who've posted for your good ideas, you have all been a most inspiring inspiration to me for my next outing to southeast Asia!!
 
Last edited:

mgb74

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 24, 2005
Messages
4,774
Location
MN and MA US
Format
Multi Format
That is what I meant. A few years ago I could not even find a commuter flight in and out of Santa Fe.

United and American have flights to Sante Fe. But for us, probably faster to fly direct to Albuquerque and drive to Santa Fe.
 

mgb74

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 24, 2005
Messages
4,774
Location
MN and MA US
Format
Multi Format
New Mexico is the only (?) state which does not an airport in the state capital. You have to fly into Albuquerque.

Minnesota's capital is St. Paul. But there's not a commercial airport in St. Paul, just Minneapolis. (Next door but - rules are rules. :smile: )
 

markjwyatt

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
2,417
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
...
Digitally (and let's face it, we all take one with us, don't we?), ...

The last few years it has been one or the other, and most of the time film won out. And that includes personal and business trips.
 

markjwyatt

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
2,417
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I like my Fuji GA645zi - autofocus zoom camera. Small & lightweight, with excellent Fuji lens...

Looks like a really excellent travel camera. Lens is a little slow though.
 

mooseontheloose

Moderator
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
4,110
Location
Kyoto, Japan
Format
Multi Format
My travel kit for the past 15 years (with few exceptions) has been a TLR and a Nikon 35mm. Originally it was a Minolta Autocord and Nikon FE, now it's Rolleiflex 3.5f and a Nikon FM3a, with 20 or 28mm and 50mm lenses. For a while I shot with a Bronica SQ system with multiple lenses and backs, but that was just too heavy. Then I went with a Mamiya 6 (50 and 75mm lenses), because I wanted something lightweight but could offer lenses wider than a TLR lens with good image quality so it could replace bringing 2 cameras when I travel. The lenses on that system are fantastic, but I could never really get used to rangefinder shooting for my style of shooting. I really should sell the whole kit...but maybe I'll take it out and give it another go before I decide.

In the end I still bring a 2 camera kit as mentioned above although I don't necessarily take both cameras out with me when shooting - one will often stay back at the hotel as a backup. That said, I also like bringing a Holga for fun stuff and because it weighs next to nothing.
 

Radost

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2021
Messages
1,658
Location
USA from Ukraine
Format
Multi Format
Hard to beat Voightlander Perkeo II with 80mm F3.5 Color-Skopar.
Very light and almost as small as a 35mm camera. Great and simple design. Frame counter, Double exposer prevention.
Real Pocket camera.
 

Sergey Ko

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2021
Messages
119
Location
Vilnius, Lithuania
Format
Analog
Hard to beat Voightlander Perkeo II with 80mm F3.5 Color-Skopar.
Very light and almost as small as a 35mm camera. Great and simple design. Frame counter, Double exposer prevention.
Real Pocket camera.
Yes, Perkeo is really an old school diamond. I saw a lot of photos from my friend, but mostly B\W. How it works in color?
Fuji GA645 is excellent for color, but as was mentioned, very slow lens. But it is the price of minimalism & zoom.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,301
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
Digitally (and let's face it, we all take one with us, don't we?),

No. I shot with a Nikon D70 on one vacation to the Outer Banks of North Carolina, and I won't do it again. Batteries running down, CF cards randomly going read-only or completely inaccessible, having to fight with the camera to exercise the skills one gains shooting film over half a century. I still carry my phone, and occasionally use it for a photo other than documenting this and that at work, but I won't depend on digital for photos that matter to me again.
 

outwest

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 18, 2005
Messages
565
Format
Multi Format
My favorite travel camera is the 3.5 Rollei and a monopod. I have also taken for 1 time each a Hassie, a Kowa Super 66, and an Autocord (smallest and lightest of my 6x6 and the only one I used B&W film in). A Zeiss Ikonta 645 has gone on a couple of trips as the nominal film camera when digital was the primary. I should add that all the 6x6 cameras did a great job but that some of my B&W favorite images are from the Ikonta.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom