Tool of the Devil, or Useful Darkroom Implement?

From the Garden

D
From the Garden

  • 1
  • 0
  • 152
Kildare

A
Kildare

  • 6
  • 1
  • 471
Sonatas XII-26 (Homes)

A
Sonatas XII-26 (Homes)

  • 3
  • 1
  • 577
Johnny Mills Shoal

H
Johnny Mills Shoal

  • 2
  • 1
  • 474
The Two Wisemen.jpg

H
The Two Wisemen.jpg

  • 0
  • 0
  • 455

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,295
Messages
2,789,274
Members
99,861
Latest member
Thomas1971
Recent bookmarks
0

Is this the tool of the Devil?

  • Definitely the tool of the Devil

    Votes: 45 84.9%
  • Something I use occasionally

    Votes: 6 11.3%
  • Something I use every time I develop film

    Votes: 2 3.8%

  • Total voters
    53

eli griggs

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2005
Messages
3,857
Location
NC
Format
Multi Format
OK, name one developer or fixer that is no a combination of "chemistry' or compounded as a chemistry.
 
OP
OP
SodaAnt

SodaAnt

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2023
Messages
429
Location
California
Format
Digital
OK, name one developer or fixer that is no a combination of "chemistry' or compounded as a chemistry.

As someone with degrees in chemistry, the photo industry is the only one I’ve encountered that uses the word in that manner.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,415
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
My water is well water and is very hard. I mix every photographic solution with steam distilled water and use distilled water for the entire film wash cycle.

(I know it’s common usage among photographers, but referring to developers, fixers, etc., as “chemistry” is like fingernails on a chalkboard to me.)

Still a great improvement of calling film development "souping the film". :sick:
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,313
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
As someone with degrees in chemistry, the photo industry is the only one I’ve encountered that uses the word in that manner.

I'm assuming you would prefer "chemicals". I do as well, but using "chemistry" instead doesn't bother me.
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,872
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
As someone with degrees in chemistry, the photo industry is the only one I’ve encountered that uses the word in that manner.

That would be because most photographers, even ones who mix up their stuff from bulk chemicals, don't know any chemistry. May as well just call it magic. X does this and Y does that but you don't need to understand why or how to make it happen. So developer, stop, fixer, toner, reducer, intensifier - all those things go in a big box generically labelled "Chemistry".
 

VinceInMT

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 14, 2017
Messages
1,890
Location
Montana, USA
Format
Multi Format
Hmmm, I was never bother by the various terms used in photography whether “chemistry,” “souping,” or “shooting” but for inexplicable reasons that I’d probably need therapy to unearth the reasons for, I do cringe when high school teachers refer to their students as “kiddos” or pet owner refer to their animals as their “fur babies.” Heck, I cringed just typing that.
 
OP
OP
SodaAnt

SodaAnt

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2023
Messages
429
Location
California
Format
Digital
Lots of confusion around terms like “hypo”. Many refer to hypo clearing agents as “hypo” when hypo really means fixer, i.e. thiosulfate solutions.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,313
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Lots of confusion around terms like “hypo”. Many refer to hypo clearing agents as “hypo” when hypo really means fixer, i.e. thiosulfate solutions.

I find that it helps when you tell them that the really old name for the active ingredient in fixer was sodium hyposulfate, so if you aren't really old, calling anything "hypo" makes you look out of date :smile:.
 

eurekaiv

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2011
Messages
248
Location
Santa Ana, CA
Format
Analog
I've gone through many trials and tribulations trying to get my negatives dry and clean without spots, scratches or dust. I settled on a very specific routine that works for me and it involves a Yankee sponge squeegee. I do have ONE VERY SPECIFIC rubber one, an older Vivitar branded thing, that works well and I tried a few, but the Yankee does the best job in the process I settled on. I'd love to not need one but I get ridiculous drying marks if I don't squeegee. And yes, I use a wetting agent and distilled water only.
 

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,560
Format
35mm RF
Oh ye of little faith.

It's not a tool or work of satan. There is no black magic to using one, just simple knowledge.

I have said it many times before on here.

If you wish to squeegee your film, you should do a few things first.
  • Use a good quality squeegee
  • Use the correct amount of wetting agent
  • Warm the squeegee blades in a beaker of warm water with a drop of wetting agent
  • Gently run your finger along each blade to check for nicks or grit.
  • To squeegee, hold the film up high and in one GENTLE movement squeegee the film.
  • The squeegee should JUST KISS the film, NOT GOUGE IT.

View attachment 346804

But then, each to his own.

(PS. I know this will bring the wrath of man upon myself) 🤓

It would be interesting to hear from Ilford as to why they made such a catastrophic mistake in this promotion and it just goes to show that manufacturers of photographic products, be it chemistry or cameras know very little or care very little about photography.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,415
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Lots of confusion around terms like “hypo”. Many refer to hypo clearing agents as “hypo” when hypo really means fixer, i.e. thiosulfate solutions.

Hypo is fixer, but for some an insertion device for drugs of choice.
 

foc

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2010
Messages
2,526
Location
Sligo, Ireland
Format
35mm
It would be interesting to hear from Ilford as to why they made such a catastrophic mistake in this promotion and it just goes to show that manufacturers of photographic products, be it chemistry or cameras know very little or care very little about photography.

I respectfully disagree with your opinions quoted above.
 
OP
OP
SodaAnt

SodaAnt

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2023
Messages
429
Location
California
Format
Digital
It would be interesting to hear from Ilford as to why they made such a catastrophic mistake in this promotion and it just goes to show that manufacturers of photographic products, be it chemistry or cameras know very little or care very little about photography.

Used carefully, a squeegee is a perfectly benign implement. Used improperly, or if it’s not cared for properly, then it can damage film.
 

eli griggs

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2005
Messages
3,857
Location
NC
Format
Multi Format
During WWII the resistance in France used red wine as a developer, horse urine and seawater as fixer…

Yes, but, in every case, the compounds and the molecules and atoms, are specific mixtures of chemistry, including the final product, no?
 

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,560
Format
35mm RF
Used carefully, a squeegee is a perfectly benign implement. Used improperly, or if it’s not cared for properly, then it can damage film.

A squeegee is an implement of impatience, as if you let film dry naturally over 24 hours there is no problem.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,313
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Yes, but, in every case, the compounds and the molecules and atoms, are specific mixtures of chemistry, including the final product, no?

No - they are specific mixtures of chemicals.
"Chemistry" is the study of chemicals.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,033
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
I had a squeegee given to me when I bought my secondhand darkroom equipment. I was new to the game and not then a member of Photrio so ignorance was bliss in the genuine sense of the word bliss as I never had a problem with it nor did I check each time that the blades had not picked up some grit or other particle that might scratch the film so I was lucky I then realised post membership of Photrio then called APUG that unless I did checks there was some risk. I did the checks and I had no problems However I then tried my squeezing the film between my middle fingers and that avoided the need for a check of the blades each time to ensure there were grit free and wet and flexible

So a good squeegee, properly handled can be fine but it is quicker now to do it with middle fingers

pentaxuser
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2023
Messages
73
Location
Australia
Format
Medium Format
I have one and it's scratched negs each time regardless of how light, hard or wet I've used it.

Now it exists solely to give my laundry roughly 4% more "film/darkroom stuff happens here" vibes.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom