Today is the day

Tyndall Bruce

A
Tyndall Bruce

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
TEXTURES

A
TEXTURES

  • 3
  • 0
  • 28
Small Craft Club

A
Small Craft Club

  • 2
  • 0
  • 33
RED FILTER

A
RED FILTER

  • 1
  • 0
  • 29
The Small Craft Club

A
The Small Craft Club

  • 3
  • 0
  • 33

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,894
Messages
2,782,696
Members
99,741
Latest member
likes_life
Recent bookmarks
0

Blighty

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2004
Messages
914
Location
Lancaster, N
Format
Multi Format
Can effects be added, like deliberately Fiddling with the focus halfway through exposure to create a soft focus effect, or tilting the enlarger slightly so that only part of the image is in focus?
Yes, anything goes!:smile:
 

Bob F.

Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2004
Messages
3,977
Location
London
Format
Multi Format
Can Cokin filters be used, I'm guessing most will have no effect but some might, fog filter for example.
One popular effect is to use diffusion for part of the time - try 50%. I have a print somewhere that I did of a rock strewn, forested hillside, tree trunks and rocks covered in moss, that looks rather spooky using this technique.

Have fun, Bob.
 

Blighty

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2004
Messages
914
Location
Lancaster, N
Format
Multi Format
I agree with Bob. Diffusion is a good effect to try out, especially as it's the shadows that tend to diffuse (rather than the highlights with a negative).My own experiments favoured 2:1 diffuser/normal split. BTW, I use Cokin filters for this. I always fancied using an ND grad as a lazy way of burning in the sky!
 
OP
OP

ajuk

Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
1,110
Format
35mm
OK so I had another go today, I'm not really enjoying doing it on my arse in the bathroom, also is there a chart that tells me what I should adjust the exposure by when changing the grade?
 

Blighty

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2004
Messages
914
Location
Lancaster, N
Format
Multi Format
Ilford give a doubling of exposure for filters #4 and 5. This sort of implies that no adjustment to exposure should be required for the other low(er) contrast filters. In practise, I've found that some difference in exposure is usually required when using different filters. I'm making a big assumption that you're using Ilford Multigrade filters here!
 

glbeas

Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2002
Messages
3,932
Location
Marietta, Ga. USA
Format
Multi Format
Do a search on the forums, theres a thread or two on that same subject where the values have been posted.
 
OP
OP

ajuk

Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
1,110
Format
35mm
Silly question but why is cooltone paper and cooltone developer cheaper than the normal stuff?

I found the datasheet, it has the Single colour filter settings for my enlarger, but not the Dual colour filter settings.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Bob F.

Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2004
Messages
3,977
Location
London
Format
Multi Format
Silly question but why is cooltone paper and cooltone developer cheaper than the normal stuff?

I found the datasheet, it has the Single colour filter settings for my enlarger, but not the Dual colour filter settings.
That would be Meopta then... Try using the Durst (max 170M) dual values: they are the same up to grade 3.5 for the single values but I don't know how close it will be - certainly you will have to wing-it above 3.5... :sad:

Good luck, Bob.
 
OP
OP

ajuk

Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
1,110
Format
35mm
Ilford give a doubling of exposure for filters #4 and 5. This sort of implies that no adjustment to exposure should be required for the other low(er) contrast filters. In practice, I've found that some difference in exposure is usually required when using different filters. I'm making a big assumption that you're using Ilford Multigrade filters here!
weird I found that the image was under exposed when I went to a lower grade not a higher one.
 

Bob F.

Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2004
Messages
3,977
Location
London
Format
Multi Format
I have noticed that every time I set up, I use about £2.50 in chems, can I put them in bottles when I am done and use them again a few days later?
For stop, yes; fixer, almost certainly; developer, probably...

Developer dies much quicker than stop (which is simply a weak acid and lasts almost indefinitely) and fixer which is more complex but still generally lasts a long time.

I find most developers I have tried will last at least a few weeks in my Nova's slots so a few days in a bottle should not be a problem. I have had Ilford warmtone in a 2 litre measuring jug, clingfilm floated on top, for over a month with no apparent change in activity.

Cheers, Bob.
 

jlehmus

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2005
Messages
40
Location
Finland
Format
35mm RF
For stop, yes; fixer, almost certainly; developer, probably...

Developer dies much quicker than stop (which is simply a weak acid and lasts almost indefinitely) and fixer which is more complex but still generally lasts a long time.

I find most developers I have tried will last at least a few weeks in my Nova's slots so a few days in a bottle should not be a problem. I have had Ilford warmtone in a 2 litre measuring jug, clingfilm floated on top, for over a month with no apparent change in activity.

Cheers, Bob.
Also, keeping the used developer in an accordion bottle helps. This may vary for different chems, but generally half-used dev can keep for many weeks, even months. But the prints don't come out very fine with old developer. You can test the condition of old dev before using it, just expose a test strip in white light and develop it. Does it turn all the way black? How quickly this happens?

If you want to economise, why not look at cheaper powder developers? I'm using Calbe N 113 that comes in bags for 5 liters and it costs just next to nothing.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom