Tmax 400 accidently shot at 100

Junkyard

D
Junkyard

  • 1
  • 2
  • 34
Double exposure.jpg

H
Double exposure.jpg

  • 4
  • 2
  • 171
RIP

D
RIP

  • 0
  • 2
  • 207
Sonatas XII-28 (Homes)

A
Sonatas XII-28 (Homes)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 184
Street with Construction

H
Street with Construction

  • 1
  • 0
  • 178

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,332
Messages
2,789,844
Members
99,876
Latest member
WillemdeLange
Recent bookmarks
0

markrewald

Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2005
Messages
140
Location
Aurora, Co
Format
Medium Format
Hello!

I accidently shot a roll of Tmax 400 at 100. I use D-76 and Rodinal as my developers.

Can someone tell me some development times for D-76 for this mistake?
 

fhovie

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2003
Messages
1,250
Location
Powell Wyoming
Format
Large Format
cut your normal d-76 time by 25% and you should be close.
 

Paul Sorensen

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Messages
1,912
Location
Saint Paul, MN
Format
Multi Format
And pay attention to what you are doing next time Mark! :D

I agree that your negs will be fine with a little less development, they would be surprisingly good with normal development. By the way Mark, you should always listen to Les, if you are nice I will loan you his book some time.

Paul.
 

titrisol

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
2,071
Location
UIO/ RDU / RTM/ POZ / GRU
Format
Multi Format
Actually over exposing those 2 stops is not bad. You'll probably get finer grained negatives.
Underdeveloping for 30% should work fine.
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2004
Messages
71
Location
Mount Pearl.
Format
4x5 Format
You've actually only over exposed by 1 stop because TMY is really a 200 ISO anyway. You were lucky because with over exposure TMY will look good but with underexposure it is nearly useless. TMY does not suffer under exposure well. Agree with the range of percentage increase in development times given; anywhere between 0-30% will work. Personally I would go with 10-15%.
 

JeffD

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2004
Messages
292
Location
Atlanta, GA
Format
4x5 Format
Funny you should bring this up- I was up late last night testing TMAX400 to get my personal film speed. I actually rate TMAX 400 at 50 (!). So, in my darkroom, you'd find you have underexposing a stop!

This is based on some film tests I did to get a zone 1 exposure equal to .1 density over fb+f. I am using HC110 H dilution (twice as dilute as B), in a jobo drum on a Beseler roller.

Seems odd to rate it so low, but I don't care. I know I'll get detailed shadows. I guess I could rate it at 400, and put my shadows on zone III or IV.

If I rate at 400, and put shadows on zone II, there is not much density there on the negative to print...

TMAX 100 I rate at 32, using the above developing routine and zone 1 density target.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom