Henricoo
Member
Hello you all,
I made the discicion to buy one of the last available Coolscan V for digitizing my many old negatives and some slides. It arrives next week, I bought it with Silverfast 6.6 and a Kodak-AT-8 calibrationslide and hope to learn soon a fast workflow. I am used to devellop nice JPEG's from RAW-files with CS3 and have my monitor calibrated with Adobe Gamma. I do know how to use Camera RAW and Photoshop, new for me is preparing the negatives and slides for scanning and using the scanner and scan-software.
My analog material (filmstrips and slides) are op till 35 years old, I shot mostly common negatives (Kodak Color Gold and Fuji) and some Ektar 25.
Who can offer me usefull sugestions to avoid a long learning curve using my new stuff?
I hope the quality of the hardware and workflow leads to nice results that makes it attractive to use my old gear (analog old Pentaxes (K2, ME-super with nice primes) more often than I use it now. I stil love the old feeling using them. Playing with small depth of field is not good possible with my digicam (Sony R1), for that purposes I need a expensive full-frame DSLR that I can't afford.
To obtain nice scans, is it better to use positive or negative material and what brand and type do you advice? I get a Kodak calibration slide from Silverfast.
Cheers
Henricoo
I made the discicion to buy one of the last available Coolscan V for digitizing my many old negatives and some slides. It arrives next week, I bought it with Silverfast 6.6 and a Kodak-AT-8 calibrationslide and hope to learn soon a fast workflow. I am used to devellop nice JPEG's from RAW-files with CS3 and have my monitor calibrated with Adobe Gamma. I do know how to use Camera RAW and Photoshop, new for me is preparing the negatives and slides for scanning and using the scanner and scan-software.
My analog material (filmstrips and slides) are op till 35 years old, I shot mostly common negatives (Kodak Color Gold and Fuji) and some Ektar 25.
Who can offer me usefull sugestions to avoid a long learning curve using my new stuff?
I hope the quality of the hardware and workflow leads to nice results that makes it attractive to use my old gear (analog old Pentaxes (K2, ME-super with nice primes) more often than I use it now. I stil love the old feeling using them. Playing with small depth of field is not good possible with my digicam (Sony R1), for that purposes I need a expensive full-frame DSLR that I can't afford.
To obtain nice scans, is it better to use positive or negative material and what brand and type do you advice? I get a Kodak calibration slide from Silverfast.
Cheers
Henricoo