• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

tips for starter scanning negatives

Vertical WPC

A
Vertical WPC

  • sly
  • Jan 30, 2026
  • 3
  • 1
  • 38
Conversations.

A
Conversations.

  • 8
  • 4
  • 82

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
202,051
Messages
2,834,438
Members
101,093
Latest member
Photorjp
Recent bookmarks
0

Henricoo

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
3
Location
Utrecht, Nederland
Hello you all,

I made the discicion to buy one of the last available Coolscan V for digitizing my many old negatives and some slides. It arrives next week, I bought it with Silverfast 6.6 and a Kodak-AT-8 calibrationslide and hope to learn soon a fast workflow. I am used to devellop nice JPEG's from RAW-files with CS3 and have my monitor calibrated with Adobe Gamma. I do know how to use Camera RAW and Photoshop, new for me is preparing the negatives and slides for scanning and using the scanner and scan-software.

My analog material (filmstrips and slides) are op till 35 years old, I shot mostly common negatives (Kodak Color Gold and Fuji) and some Ektar 25.

Who can offer me usefull sugestions to avoid a long learning curve using my new stuff?

I hope the quality of the hardware and workflow leads to nice results that makes it attractive to use my old gear (analog old Pentaxes (K2, ME-super with nice primes) more often than I use it now. I stil love the old feeling using them. Playing with small depth of field is not good possible with my digicam (Sony R1), for that purposes I need a expensive full-frame DSLR that I can't afford.

To obtain nice scans, is it better to use positive or negative material and what brand and type do you advice? I get a Kodak calibration slide from Silverfast.

Cheers
Henricoo
 
OP
OP

Henricoo

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
3
Location
Utrecht, Nederland
Two questions using Silverfast

My scanner arrived last monday and I get very nice results out of it. I use Silverfast 6.6. on my Coolscan V and my workflow now is:

1. prescanning and optimize scannersettings with "auto-adjust" and twicking the overall brightness-slider for nice midtonescontrast

2. scanning the image on 4000 dpi and 14 bit colordepth with ICE-fine

3. after saving as TIFF postprocessing it in CS3 (I am familiair with that)

4. cropping to 2400 * 3600 format, converting to 8-bit and saving as high JPEG (5 - 8 Mb)

Two questions:

So far no problem, I only can't get the scanner doing this in a batch-job for filmstrips with 5 or six images. What am I doing wrong? Can anybody give me some stepwise advice how to do this?

For negatives I use "negative direct", works OK but I also can choose "negative". I get a menu then where I can select filmtype, ISO etc. When I use that I got a negative-scan result (orange) that needs to be converted. How can that be done and has this workflow advantages over using the "negative direct"-way when postprocessing in CS3 is used too?

I hope anybody can help me.

Henricoo
 

pellicle

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
1,175
Location
Finland
Format
4x5 Format
Hi

Well first I'd suggest a quick look through Scantips.com, then if you're comfortable with all that I'd say to look carefully at what your scanner does at the shoulder and toe of the negatives. I recommend you split the colour channels and inspect them carefully. I have found that most "negative" sections for scanner are just that wee bit agressive at setting black and white points. I prefer to adjust things my way, so I find that scanning a negative as a positive and then working with it in photoshop preferable. I typically do something like:
  1. prescan as positive
  2. set black and white points for each or R G and B
  3. scan into photoshop
  4. assign the maker profile for that scanner (cos my working space is often ProRGB)
  5. invert
  6. alter levels still leaving a little breathing space
  7. use curves to bring the toe and shoulder levels in to line
  8. sometimes an AutoColour works well at this point (NB: not if you're using layers).

It takes a little time to get the hang of it. I've put a few of the thoughts about this on this page. Which eventually led me to what I wrote on this page.


Then I'd say look at your colour profiles, I found that for my Epsons that I need to assign the profile (it it isn't my default working space [which it itsn't]) before I do anything else to get really trouble free working. I put this article up on my blog to explain that.

happy to chat about this (as I'll no doubt learn more too ;-)
 
OP
OP

Henricoo

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 9, 2009
Messages
3
Location
Utrecht, Nederland
ICC profiles

Thanks for your reply, I'm still learning to get my workflow better and better. I now use the negative-function in Silverfast so I can do settings as filmtype, brand and ISO. Using the sliders "exposure" and "tollerance" I beware the analogue data is covered by the dynamic range of my Coolscan. In the menu "histogram" I keep the range as wide as possible because of the high D-factor of my scanner and the 14-bit capture. I use the ICE-fine function that does a increddable job in scrath and dust-removement and also removes grain effectivally. I then get a 128 Mb TIFF that looks as a transparrancy; soft and glossy, but has all information in it. Imported in CS3 I'll do the post-processing using auto-levels, color-balance, contrast unsharp masking and the more sophisticated adjustments. This results in nice clear 2400*3600 JPEG's (4 - 8 Mb). So far I'm happy with it.

I'm not interested in batch scanning anymore because I found out that every scan needs a prescan and manual adjustments for a good base-TIFF.

What I want to learn is using ICC-profiles. As told I made my personal profile using Adobe-Gamma that's loaded with booting up my PC. In CS3 there are so many places where I can set profiles, I just don't understand it very well.

I sent a test-JPEG to several Lab's, using the possablillaty for correcting with yes and no, they all look different, exposure was OK but saturation was a bit to low. I can level the monitor-settings with the avarage prints, I suggest a better way is to do that with ICC-profiles. Who has helpfull information about that?
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom