Times Photographer Fired For Altering Pic...

Kitahara Jinja

D
Kitahara Jinja

  • 0
  • 0
  • 9
Custom Cab

A
Custom Cab

  • 1
  • 1
  • 37
Table for four.

H
Table for four.

  • 9
  • 0
  • 98
Waiting

A
Waiting

  • 5
  • 0
  • 92

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,597
Messages
2,761,650
Members
99,410
Latest member
lbrown29
Recent bookmarks
0

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
Well, what if you don't point the lens at something that tells a different story than what you do point the lens at? "Cropping" vs. "framing" just seems like a technicality in that respect.
 
Joined
Apr 18, 2003
Messages
11
Hello,



The very first time that I saw this picture was in the Chicago Tribune (Chicago newspaper) before it was discovered that the image was manipulated. There was something in the photograph that just didn't look right to me at the time; The soldier did not look in perspective to the rest of the picture. I then turned the page because I did not find the photo to be of interest to me, rather boring actually.



So they fired the person that manipulated the photo which was the photographer. Maybe the newspaper should have let the picture editor go for not doing his job-selecting a newsworthy photograph.
 

mvjim

Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2003
Messages
84
Location
New York Cit
There has been a "suggestion" for a few years now by Fred Richter - that any photograph that has gone through a digital process be labled as such. The purpose being that ".....photographs do not lie........" in the mind of the general public. He has suggested that every published photo be captioned with a symbol that marks the image as changed or not. This is something that we will all have to face and deal with as digital technology continues to dominate news photography. Most of us, as photographers, seem to be more concerned with the differences between the reproductive differences of traditional materials vs digital rather than where this new technology is taking us. We seemly concern ourselves with the personal issue of these differences (ease of reproduction, archival quality, etc.) rather than the larger question of public trust in the image. Maybe its time to put aside the hype that the manufacters of these have worked so hard at to push this technology and begin to ask these harder questions - what should or can we believe?
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom