I've personally learned to love my Monochrom. It does exactly what is supposed to do and does it well. It puts me in a shooting flow that is similar to film (filters) and with no need to jump through hoops to convert later. I'm using it exclusively for my photogravure work, since I see no reason to torture myself scanning film to make digital positives for copper. The monochrom offers level of details that are in the medium format category, and for alternate process work, the possibilities are endless. I have a section on my website for the Monochrom/photogravure work, @ Dead Link Removed
That will be interesting. Looking forward to your conclusions Ralph.
I am convinced of the quality of the product and the quality of the output from the Monochrom. If I were to be completely honest with myself, and everyone else, a large part of my hesitation is because I don't feel completely ready to commit entirely to a digital workflow for all of my photography. Besides a hard learned lack of trust in the permanence of those digital ones and zeros being stored on my hard drives, I still fully enjoy exposing, developing and printing black and white film. I am afraid that once I commit the resources necessary to purchase the Monochrom I will feel compelled to leave film behind for good.
the short report:Nikon D800 owners need a Leica MM as much as they need a Ferrari Teste rosa. Nikon's monochrome settings are excellent.for me ,the case is closed;money saved; on what can I spend it now?Epson 3880,ink and an Adobe CC subscription?well, next week I'll have the opportunity to compare it side-by-side with my Nikon D800. then,I'll be able to tell, but I'm hoping thatan image that started as a 14bit-color capture,andconverted in PSand beefed up by somebody who knows what they are oing
(me
)will beat the LeicaMonochrome capture.Let's see where my big mouth gets me.I'll report.
OMG I think you're right there, the price is without lens!!!
Amazing!
What are they thinking?The more it costs;they more people think it's worth?not me I'll stick to my D800
Oh Felnik! Please, say it isn't true! Ok, no FF Pentax, very frustrating I know. I do understand, but Nikon?
Have you ever laid your hands on a Nikon FE/FE2 or F3 ?
If not, do your homework then get back and let me know what you have to say then….
JF
I have owned the F, the F3HP, the F4, the F100 and most recently, the D600. I didn't own them all at once but I bought each one attempting to determine what everyone found so attractive about them. The only one of the batch that I enjoyed at all was the F, so I kept it. The rest are all gone. Never handled the FE but decided enough was enough.
Same thing happened with Canon but I do think they go it right with the original 5D, so I kept that one too. Helps offset the disappointment over a FF Pentax I guess. Not very weather resistant but it does OK. Darn nice black & white for a digital.
No, I've done my homework, and in my book the Pentax SV, Spotmatic and LX were more than a match for the vaunted Nikon or Canon, but to each his own. I guess that is why there are so many different cameras.
Have a terrific Holidays.
I've had loads of really nice Pentax film bodies, and still do have some left, but since there's no FF digital in sight, and I want to keep my lens investments in one and the same range for both film and digital, Pentax was out of the game and I do prefer Nikon to Canon, especially on the film side…
Happy New Year
JF.
That's for you to decide. Shoot a few frames and post process them. If you don't think they look better than SOOC, you have your answer.Thanks for this thread, because it sparked a latent curiosity: can you get good (final) frames straight out of camera or do you always need to post-process?
… good (final) frames straight out of camera or do you always need to post-process? …
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?