Alex Benjamin
Subscriber
For those who use TTB regularly but don't have Thornton's book Edge of Darkness, there are some interesting notes in there on contrast control when using the developer. I find them useful, as, with the heat of summer, I've noticed a slight increase in contrast (albeit with no blown highlights) with HP5+ @ ISO250 with the devevloper at 24ºC when doing my normal 5 minute time in each baths.
Here's what Thornton wrote after giving the formula :
"You can fine tune the contrast of your negatives with this formula by increasing or decreasing the amount of Sodium Metaborate in the second bath between about 7 and 20 grams [note: formula asks for 12 grams in 1 litre]. In fact, you can get a kind of Zone system development control by having three different Bath Bs mixed — on each of 7, 12 and 20 grams content to handle very high, average, or very low subject brithness range respectively. [...]
Incidentally, Bath A, without an alkali activator, lasts a long long time in a well sealed bottle — much longer than conventional developer. A year is not uncommon. All that happens is that a small amount is absorbed by each film, developer, and the volume is slightly decreased each time of use. Replenishment is unnecessary. 15 films per litre are easily developed before replacement. Bath B discolors because of oxidised traces of Bath A in it, but this does not reduce its effectiveness. Again 15 films per litre are easily achieved."
This, I believe, corrects some opinions regarding the effectiveness of Bath B after a few films stated in the thread started by @What About Bob here.
Here's what Thornton wrote after giving the formula :
"You can fine tune the contrast of your negatives with this formula by increasing or decreasing the amount of Sodium Metaborate in the second bath between about 7 and 20 grams [note: formula asks for 12 grams in 1 litre]. In fact, you can get a kind of Zone system development control by having three different Bath Bs mixed — on each of 7, 12 and 20 grams content to handle very high, average, or very low subject brithness range respectively. [...]
Incidentally, Bath A, without an alkali activator, lasts a long long time in a well sealed bottle — much longer than conventional developer. A year is not uncommon. All that happens is that a small amount is absorbed by each film, developer, and the volume is slightly decreased each time of use. Replenishment is unnecessary. 15 films per litre are easily developed before replacement. Bath B discolors because of oxidised traces of Bath A in it, but this does not reduce its effectiveness. Again 15 films per litre are easily achieved."
This, I believe, corrects some opinions regarding the effectiveness of Bath B after a few films stated in the thread started by @What About Bob here.