Thomas Kinkade's death

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,081
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
Wallace Nutting (1861 - 1941) was an American (New England area) minister, furniture-maker and photographer. His furniture-making was of copies of older styles, expertly done.

At one time he hired up to 200 "colorists" to hand-color (and I suppose darkroom assistants to print) his photographs. Very popular as wedding presents. Sometimes the colorists would also sign Nutting's name on the print. He estimated that he sold 10 million prints. Sales geared towards the middle class.

I grew up with a couple of them on our walls. Not bad pieces, I preferred the two C. Watkins we had.

Tim -- I guess it was AA's musical background that influenced his printing (the old score vs performance thing). Oren Mills Sr died in 1978 -- his company of portrait studios and church directories was sold to Lifetouch last year.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,530
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
Vaughn said:
Oren Mills Sr died in 1978 -- his company of portrait studios and church directories was sold to Lifetouch last year.
Click to expand...

I didn't know they were sold. Last week I was thinking of starting a separate thread because I, for the third time in this lifetime, participated in a church directory. Each time it was for a fairly large church (about 4,000 registered families) and the production-line aspect is quite impressive. The resulting portraits are somewhere between OK an ddreadful if you ask me. What I found interesting this time, though, is the sales aspect of their "free chruch directory". I always left that to my wife. I only saw what we bought, and what a few other families bought. In 30 minutes I think I saw each family buy between $150 and $400 worth of their product. The salesperson's opening salvo was a $350 package. "WOW, what a racket" was my first response adn I'm happy that I could keep that within the confines of my noggin without ever moving my mouth. I really wonder how much they make from these "free chruch directory" schemes. Must be a fortune... and most families seemed very happy with their work. The mass appeal and mass marketting analogy seems similar. I was wondering how many families will be replacing the Thos. Kinkade art hanging over hteir couch with a big Olan Mills framed portrait. :confused:
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,530
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
Thanks, Vaughn... I'm so far behind in reading the newpaper!
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
sdotkling said:
Ooh, good, a fight about "art"!
Click to expand...

naaah im not fighting, i am trying to figure out what i think as i write these posts... i am kind of "conflicted" .
part of me is inspired by kinkade, how he managed to create all these scenes
that people love/loved to buy ... and part of me wonders how people could buy
the stuff he is / was selling. i guess i was off the mark comparing adams to kinkade
but sometimes one has to make an absurd comparison to figure out where you stand ...

i wonder who is going to be the next (self-)mass produced artist ..
and i wonder if whoever it will be, will have the stamina to create hundreds/thousands of paintings
and make millions from selling reproductions, and stay alive past 55.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

eclarke

Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Messages
1,950
Location
New Berlin,
Format
ULarge Format
So...How many here have sold out by receiving money for things they do? Only people who get no money, food, clothing, shelter or anything else for any of their efforts at anything can truly call themselves "artists".. I put dirty words in quotation marks..They guy made a successful living..
 

blansky

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2002
Messages
5,952
Location
Wine country, N. Cal.
Format
Medium Format
k_jupiter said:
I don't like AA just because of the amount of manipulation it takes to create those prints, as if they aren't prints of those negatives, but fabrications for the lust of the general public.
Click to expand...

Interesting opinion.

Firstly I don't think he was making prints for the public, although that was done later.

The way I see it he was observing a scene and seeing or fore-seeing what he could do to "improve" it. That's part of the reason for having incredibly exposed negatives.

He was sort of a contradiction because he was part of F64 which was the antithesis to the pictorialists or romanticism he wished to replace. I think they saw their work as realism.

The irony is that his work is not really realism but maybe hyper-realism which could be described as a form of romanticism of a particular scene.
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,081
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
k_jupiter said:
...But good expressions of what AA wanted to present. It just wasn't what AA shot.

That said, I do a bit of manipulation of my scenic landscapes, it's part of pulling in what I saw to the material I have available.

tim in san jose
Click to expand...

Also this begs the question was AA (or you) totally color blind? B&W photography is one major step beyond what any of us see/shoot.
 

ROL

Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2005
Messages
795
Location
California
Format
Multi Format
Reading many of these sour grapes posts referencing AA, I would simply suggest that it would at least be wise to spend some time actually reading about the man and his art before categorizing and judging him. There is one autobiography as well as the book "Letters...". And then spend some time in the Sierra Nevada, away from the burger joints.
 

Brian C. Miller

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2010
Messages
486
Location
Everett, WA
Format
Large Format
Vaughn said:
Also this begs the question was AA (or you) totally color blind? B&W photography is one major step beyond what any of us see/shoot.
Click to expand...

Adams did a good bit of photography in color. However, it just wasn't his bag, as it were. There was a pretty hefty book published awhile ago title, "Ansel Adams in Color." Decent photographs, but nothing really spectacular. I suspect that he just didn't pursue it.
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid

sour grapes ?

i hope it isn't me you are referring to.

i have read quite a bit about him, i have no way to get to the sierra nevadas, and really don't
know why i need to put my tripod in his holes and see the sights he saw to have an opinion
of the work he produced. if i could get away from my obligations
to go there, it wouldn't really change my mind about "the grand landscape".
i can understand why a lot of people LOVE his work, to each their own

...i am more interested in the landscape photographers in the 1800s who had massive obstacles
to overcome in order to be able to get to remote areas on foot or horse and photograph something for the first time
using a process that was quite different than modern photography ... it isn't "the view" that interests me
it is what they had to do to make the photographs that interests me more.


john
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,081
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format

Not quite my point -- just the simple point that if we photograph and print in B&W, then we are not photographing just what we see...thus seemingly weakening Tim in San Jose's point that AA's manipulation during printing drastically changed "what he saw".

I find John's position on AA to be an extreme one (that AA = Kinkade as artists). And as with any extremist, his view helps in defining a middle path...as do the extremists who would award AA with sainthood. Argueing with extremists can be entertaining, but rather fruitless, since a good arguement or debate requires the use of logic and the ability (and willingness) to understand the other's POV. .
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Alan W

Member
Joined
May 16, 2009
Messages
551
Location
Tennessee
Format
Medium Format
"The World is going to pieces and people like Adams and Weston are photographing rocks"A little wisdom from HCB.
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,081
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
Alan W said:
"The World is going to pieces and people like Adams and Weston are photographing rocks"A little wisdom from HCB.
Click to expand...

And poets making poems about love, and writers writing stories about the soul, and musicians writing songs to move the spirit. HCB needed to chill.
 

blansky

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2002
Messages
5,952
Location
Wine country, N. Cal.
Format
Medium Format
Alan W said:
"The World is going to pieces and people like Adams and Weston are photographing rocks"A little wisdom from HCB.
Click to expand...

Yes, but I believe HBC was in Europe at the time and Adams and Weston were in Big Sur.

Perspectives often differ due to location.
 

Alan Klein

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2010
Messages
1,067
Location
New Jersey .
Format
Multi Format

Here you go.

Dead Link Removed

Dead Link Removed
 

artonpaper

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
336
Location
Staten Island, New York
Format
Multi Format
Reading all the responses since I first responded has given me much food for thought, but reading over what I wrote earlier, I still feel the same way. So, I guess I know too much about Adams that I can't help but feel the seriousness of work. Whether Kinkade was cynical or not, I don't know, but like I said, I can't help but feel cynical when I kook at his outpouring. I knew Lisette Model, and she thought AA's work was boring. I'd never heard anyone say that before, but after that remark, I was never able to look at his work with the dewy eyed admiration I had prior to that. But I just saw a large Moonrise at the AIPAD show and I lingered and I found myself becoming entranced.

Some of the remarks about gallery art and art for the masses are very interesting, but that's an old conundrum that will always be with us. There is a polarity in all the arts, whether it's Ogden Nash and Sylvia Plath, Kenny G and Coltrane, or Kinkade and Odd Nurdrum.

I'll take Nurdrum over Kinkade, The Parke-Harrisons over Adams, (and Hendrix over Clapton). There's an audience for everything. And selling work isn't selling out. I just bought new supplies from a print sale. Making work with the main intention of selling it, that's selling out.
 

Darkroom317

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
653
Location
Mishawaka, IN
Format
Large Format
Alan Klein said:
Here you go.

Dead Link Removed

Dead Link Removed
Click to expand...


Read further in my post. I didn't say they don't exist. I am saying that I have no seen them in shops however I am aware that they can be found online. My point was that such objects are not nearly as prevalent as with Kinkade.
 

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format
If you gild a turd, sell it for a huge price and get people to wax idiotic about it's percieved "virtues", guess what? It's still a turd.
 

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,793
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format

That's why Berenice Abbott, among the few to call shenanigans on the Straight's fight against Pictorialism, called Adams, Weston, and the later Stieglitz "Super-Pictorialists", in the sense that they exhibited the same amount of print fetishism than Mortensen.

The main difference between f/64 and Pictorialism is the kind of painting they associate with. The former with Clement Greenberg-championed flat, geometrical modernism; the latter with late 19th C. Symbolist or pre-Raphaelite paintings.

It's my hope that in future histories of photography, "straight" photography stops being seen as a break from Pictorialism, but rather like a competing school with similar aesthetic values.
 
OP
OP

Mainecoonmaniac

Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
6,297
Format
Multi Format
I've heard on my local NPR station in Sacramento that the original Thomas Kinkade gallery in Placerville sold one of his paintings for $150K. I think there are better investments in art. I'll bet the poor investor didn't do well investing in Beanie Babies so he or she decided to invest in a Kinkade.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…