The owner of my retail photo store in Melbourne drives a Maserati. His partner has a new Peugeot. Their grown-up kids also have company cars. The parents own a million dollar home and the two sprogs were given apartments, all paid for by the family trust.
By comparison and by contrast, we live more modestly and affordably in a pleasant country house and we drive a 30 year old Audi.
Yes, I own a Leica, a 1954 iif I obviously bought used. Also four Rollei TLRs, ditto on their purchase. The only new camera I've bought in the past decade or longer was a Nikon D800 demo I got a good price on in 2019, and intend to go on using until I'm through with photography. The day I bought my Nikon, a man in front of me was coughing up $20,000+ for a Hasselblad kit for his son, an art photography student. I'm sure the kid is enjoying daddy's largesse, but that twenty Gs would buy me a lot of other things I want more. I wonder if the profit on that sale went on the new Maserati the shop owner got that same year.
I for one don't feel the need to contribute to their economic well-being. Online buying here in Australia is a joke, with Ebay sellers trying to flog off expired film at higher prices than I can buy it new. I buy my films as and when I find them discounted, at store sales and privately. Chemistry and paper when I can get these at less than the usual several hundred percent markups the photo industry in Australia adds to everything it sells.
Bricks and mortar, hell. It's more about big profits, million dollar waterside houses and new Maseratis.
So I should feel feel "guilty" about this?? Hah!! Anyone saying yes is full of what makes gardens grow greener...